The most compelling use of color in music theory that I've encountered is a color scheme where individual notes are given primary colors (yellow, red, blue) like this: C is yellow, C#/Db is red, D is blue, D#/Eb is yellow,...etc First observation: the notes of each of the three diminished tetrads are monochromatic (their notes all have the same color.) Then, look at the major minor triads and assign them secondary co…
Chromatone – Visual Music Language
41–50 of 97 posts
Re: Chromatone – Visual Music Language
#42The most compelling use of color in music theory that I've encountered is a color scheme where individual notes are given primary colors (yellow, red, blue) like this: C is yellow, C#/Db is red, D is blue, D#/Eb is yellow,...etc First observation: the notes of each of the three diminished tetrads are monochromatic (their notes all have the same color.) Then, look at the major minor triads and assign them secondary co…
I think they're color-coding with the root note (or key?) being red which makes more sense than coloring the note names. Similar to how hearing perfect pitch can be a bit of an annoyance (with unnecessary detail) than useful.
I ultimately made peace with this because the greater goal is to break you out of the key prison so you can learn to move anywhere. In this light, it makes sense to assign the colors to the pitch class.
Re: Chromatone – Visual Music Language
#43This seems kind of like inventing a QWERTY alternative. The best thing about QWERTY is that its ubiquitous and good enough, not that it's optimal. Although in the case of chromatone, I don't see any arguments made about technical improvements. Instead of spelling note names with letters, we have colors. Why is this better? This some argument about the visible spectrum mapping. But like, how is that useful? I can tell…
just play with it
Re: Chromatone – Visual Music Language
#44Re: Chromatone – Visual Music Language
#45This seems kind of like inventing a QWERTY alternative. The best thing about QWERTY is that its ubiquitous and good enough, not that it's optimal. Although in the case of chromatone, I don't see any arguments made about technical improvements. Instead of spelling note names with letters, we have colors. Why is this better? This some argument about the visible spectrum mapping. But like, how is that useful? I can tell…
it is a cool toy just play with it
Re: Chromatone – Visual Music Language
#46If you want to analyze it algorithmically, you probably need to start looking at topology or something so that you can correctly relate musical structures in a way that is resistant to transposition.
Re: Chromatone – Visual Music Language
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
I got that too, but had never seen that permission before. I just went ahead and allowed it. Current best practice is not to ask permissions like that (location, notifications, or programming midi devices) on landing, but to stick them behind an interaction like a toggle or button press.
Recently chrome started asking for permission to use MIDI, when before it did not. So lots of existing sites won't tell you that they will request MIDI, which is what most sites that request the webcam do for good UX.
Re: Chromatone – Visual Music Language
#48This really doesn't reflect the actual structure of Western music for those without absolute pitch (the vast majority of people). Instead, it's pretty much just relations that matter between pitches which makes things way more difficult to visualize. Mixing red and blue gives you a different color than red and green, but A-C is pretty much the same as Bb-Db, they're both minor thirds. If you want to analyze it algori…
Here's some alternative keyboard layouts that explore that idea:
Re: Chromatone – Visual Music Language
#49There’s a short segment dedicated to it at 1h5m https://youtu.be/Eq3bUFgEcb4