Live data from Hacker News

Self-Hosting DNS

ghostdev.xyz

41–50 of 72 posts

Re: Self-Hosting DNS

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

not really. it's about the blocking occurring in reach of the user (client) or not (infrastructure quirk that has to be worked around)

DNS isn't "infrastructure". It's just a simple key-value store, like Redis or something.

dns more or less was infrastructure for the last 30 years. nobody cared.

the fact that for-profit shops wanted a piece of the intelligence within made it surface and now the webheads are shitting on it like there is no tomorrow

Re: Self-Hosting DNS

#42
I recently switched from Pi-Hole to AdGuard Home, it was pretty straightforward to migrate my configuration and so far it's working great. I've actually got two servers running AGH + unbound (authoritative) so my internet keeps working if one setup breaks/reboots.

Re: Self-Hosting DNS

#43
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Assuming I am looking at the right comment, you didn't really expand/explain all that much. If I am correct, your argument boils down to blocking happening outside the direct control of the user. This technically is true, as you don't have an icon in your browser like you would have with an extension. At the same time, it being outside the control of the user is not really true if the user is also the person in contr…

it's a practical argument as soon as someone else has to use it

Sure, but that is not the context here. So I am still unsure about the "evil" aspect of it all.

Even if someone else has to use it. Certainly, when it is someone in their household who can access the administration for their client devices/applications as well.

Other people affected might be those who make use of the authors wifi. Where the author can also opt for guest wifi using regular DNS. Or not even do it on router basis and really a per-client basis.

The only context in which it is potentially "evil" or malicious is when people unknowingly get things blocked or redirected to the wrong things. But that is pretty far removed from the context of this article.

Re: Self-Hosting DNS

#44
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

vps with static ip will go for half of that

Make it a tenth. I have two small VPS with two different providers, and I am paying a total of $25/year for them.

I'm a bit old fashioned. its not self hosting if you dont hold the hardware :-P

Re: Self-Hosting DNS

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’d like to see a comparison

Half of the article is literally a comparison between pihole and adguard...

Really? Because what I got out from the article was a table that did a comparison then the rest of the was focused towards AdGuard. But I found a thread on r/selfhosted that was more about comparing these two.

Re: Self-Hosting DNS

#46
> By using multiple different resolvers, operated by different companies, no single one gets the whole picture.

I’d say exact opposite. Now you’re sharing data with multiple parties and each is potentially getting enough data to extrapolate the whole picture

Re: Self-Hosting DNS

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

DNS isn't "infrastructure". It's just a simple key-value store, like Redis or something.

dns more or less was infrastructure for the last 30 years. nobody cared. the fact that for-profit shops wanted a piece of the intelligence within made it surface and now the webheads are shitting on it like there is no tomorrow

Nah, BIND is just really shitty software, so everybody thought that DNS must be mystical and special.

Run a better DNS server and see for yourself that there isn't any man behind that curtain.

Re: Self-Hosting DNS

#49
Does anyone know of a good authoritative DNS server that supports Dynamic DNS updates? Preferably exclusively standardized stuff. I currently run CoreDNS on my network, but dynamic registration isn't supported and might never be.

Re: Self-Hosting DNS

#50
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Make it a tenth. I have two small VPS with two different providers, and I am paying a total of $25/year for them.

I'm a bit old fashioned. its not self hosting if you dont hold the hardware :-P

What about if you use the VPS for a wireguard tunnel, so your beefier server at home has a public IP? Does that count?

It's what I'm doing since we switched ISPs and now we are behind CGNAT (better connection otherwise though).

Post reply on HN