Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Free speech is not without consequences. It’s just that the consequences you face are reverse proportional to your wealth.
Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
41–50 of 1001 posts
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
> With the remote work push, the argument about talent pool is moot as well. Isn't Elon massively anti-remote?
Not only Elon Musk. Lots of companies are backtracking on full remote work. Statu quo seems to be hybrid work for many big companies.
Not all organisations or executives have a vested interest in commercial real estate. Especially this late in the game when plenty of orgs have had an opportunity to let their leases expire.
Not all RTO action is due to some perverted desire by incompetent managers to see subordinate butts in seats, either.
There is a sizeable contingent of leadership that legitimately sees in-person work as the best means of eliciting productivity from their staff, and are willing to trade off taking a hit from some staff not being happy about this, and potentially leaving. You might not agree with the strategy. You might strongly feel that it’s wrong. But the reality is that they believe it.
Furthermore there is certainly a sizeable contingent of staff that would prefer a hybrid role to full WFH. I’m not talking about faceless sales leadership extroverts as techies often put it. I’m talking about ICs. I’m talking about developers.
And there are certainly, certainly people that just don’t feel as strongly about it as a lot of the people here.
I’d love for just one WFH-related thread to not devolve into faux-intelligent basically-xeroxed screeds about commercial real estate and dumb management.
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#43[flagged]
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#44[flagged]
You might be right when it comes to employees, but definitely not when it comes to users. There's a lot of people using X, and the vast, vast majority of them don't care much for Musk or actively dislike him. THe problem with X is that it is (and always was) sort of an echo chamber, there's no average X user, everybody sees very different content based on what they follow. The average HNer probably won't notice the h…
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#45Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#46[flagged]
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#47Doing this on a few weeks notice seems rather insane to me. Unless you have very good remote work options this is very disruptive for employees.
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#48[flagged]
You might be right when it comes to employees, but definitely not when it comes to users. There's a lot of people using X, and the vast, vast majority of them don't care much for Musk or actively dislike him. THe problem with X is that it is (and always was) sort of an echo chamber, there's no average X user, everybody sees very different content based on what they follow. The average HNer probably won't notice the h…
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#49Doing this on a few weeks notice seems rather insane to me. Unless you have very good remote work options this is very disruptive for employees.
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#50[flagged]
You might be right when it comes to employees, but definitely not when it comes to users. There's a lot of people using X, and the vast, vast majority of them don't care much for Musk or actively dislike him. THe problem with X is that it is (and always was) sort of an echo chamber, there's no average X user, everybody sees very different content based on what they follow. The average HNer probably won't notice the h…