Live data from Hacker News

CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

clownstrike.lol

41–50 of 243 posts

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#41

What I don't understand is why companies and brands like this just don't use NameBlock or a similar domain blocking service like GlobalBlock. They literally can block domain names that have their company name or brand in them from being registered (up to 500 variations of their domain). It's literally like $99/year to place a block. Saves a lot of the hassle of having to deal with parody and phishing sites and trying…

How does that work in practice? Are you just paying them to lease it so you don’t have to?

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#43
post #6

Surely those resources could be better spent on functional Uber Eats gift cards.

I heard they canceled the gift cards or they didn't work.

This is preposterous! I already ordered chicken chowmein with it

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#45

> I’m most definitely not trying to put CloudFlare in the middle on this… so I told CloudFlare that I will take the site off of CloudFlare; however, it is staying on the internet… I mean that’s kind, but the whole point of DMCA safe harbor provisions is that they aren’t in the middle of this. They send along the notice, you file a counter notice, and that’s it for their involvement, yeah? If CrowdStrike wants to pres…

Yeah but you don't want to keep getting emails from Cloudflare or have them kick you off anyway since they don't want to keep getting emails either.

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#46
post #10

I wonder to what extent companies consider the reputational damage these kinds of enforcement actions cause. I recently came across this when googling for information on a small Biotech startup: https://udrp.adr.eu/decisions/detail?id=65fab3e46fc02956a010... Will probably be the first thing I remember when I hear their name.

Oh wow, they sued someone who used his last name as a domain name because they feel like their trademark should allow them to prohibit him from using his family name ... And obviously they registered their trademark after he started using his name.

> And obviously they registered their trademark after he started using his name.

Actually, the company’s trademarks are from 2017 and he got his name via marriage in 2020.

Still a stupid suit

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#48

What I don't understand is why companies and brands like this just don't use NameBlock or a similar domain blocking service like GlobalBlock. They literally can block domain names that have their company name or brand in them from being registered (up to 500 variations of their domain). It's literally like $99/year to place a block. Saves a lot of the hassle of having to deal with parody and phishing sites and trying…

I don't think you could block "clown" or "strike".

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#50
post #10

I wonder to what extent companies consider the reputational damage these kinds of enforcement actions cause. I recently came across this when googling for information on a small Biotech startup: https://udrp.adr.eu/decisions/detail?id=65fab3e46fc02956a010... Will probably be the first thing I remember when I hear their name.

Remember how KPMG claimed nobody is allowed to link to their site? I 'member.
Post reply on HN