the vision here is amazing, but I can't help but feel a bit uncertain about basing a "safe super intelligence" lab in an apartheid state that is currently genociding its indigenous population using variants of the very same technology
Safe Superintelligence Inc.
41–50 of 1001 posts
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#42Glad to see Ilya is back in a position to contribute to advancing AI. I wonder how they are going to manage to pay the kinds of compensation packages that truly gifted AI researchers can make now from other companies that are more commercially oriented. Perhaps they can find people who are ideologically driven and/or are already financially independent. It's also hard to see how they will be able to access enough com…
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#43It seems to me it would be much safer and more intelligent to create a massive model and distribute the benefits among everyone. Why not use a P2P approach?
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#44Glad to see Ilya is back in a position to contribute to advancing AI. I wonder how they are going to manage to pay the kinds of compensation packages that truly gifted AI researchers can make now from other companies that are more commercially oriented. Perhaps they can find people who are ideologically driven and/or are already financially independent. It's also hard to see how they will be able to access enough com…
given the nature of their mission, this shouldn't be too terribly difficult; many gifted researchers do not go to the highest bidder
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#45The site is a good example of Poe's Law. If I didn't know that it was real, I would have thought it was parody. > We are assembling a lean, cracked team of the world’s best engineers and researchers dedicated to focusing on SSI and nothing else. Do you have to have a broken bone to join? Apparently, grammatical nuances are not an area of focus for safety, unless they think that a broken team ("cracked") is an asset i…
Just realized - we even say "it's not all its cracked up to be" as a negative statement which would imply "cracked up" is positive.
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#46Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#47Isn't this a philosophical/psychological problem instead? Technically it's solved, just censor any response that doesn't match a list of curated categories, until a technician whitelists it. But the technician could be confronted with a compelling "suicide song":
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#48the vision here is amazing, but I can't help but feel a bit uncertain about basing a "safe super intelligence" lab in an apartheid state that is currently genociding its indigenous population using variants of the very same technology
Re: Safe Superintelligence Inc.
#49Surprising to see Gross involved. He seems to be pretty baked into the YC world, which usually means "very commercially oriented".