Earlier quoted context omitted.
And smell and bacterial levels are absolutely correlated
They are. But the solution to each might be different. And given the specific argument being contested here is whether beer was drank because it was considered safer, understanding their motives is pretty fundamental to that discussion.
The Myth of Medieval Small Beer (2017)
41–50 of 98 posts
Re: The Myth of Medieval Small Beer (2017)
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
People have diarrhoea a lot today, in developed countries with stable access to clean water and food. If anything, people massively underestimate the amount of diarrhoea premodern living involved.
>People have diarrhoea a lot today, in developed countries with stable access to clean water and food My personal experience suggests it's pretty uncommon. Maybe once every few years, and I eat all sorts of questionable things.
Re: The Myth of Medieval Small Beer (2017)
#431. Various contiminants make water taste bad. 2. Bad tasting water is unhealthy.
It's not a full theory of microbiology of course, but it's something.
Re: The Myth of Medieval Small Beer (2017)
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
People have diarrhoea a lot today, in developed countries with stable access to clean water and food. If anything, people massively underestimate the amount of diarrhoea premodern living involved.
>People have diarrhoea a lot today, in developed countries with stable access to clean water and food My personal experience suggests it's pretty uncommon. Maybe once every few years, and I eat all sorts of questionable things.
Re: The Myth of Medieval Small Beer (2017)
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
What, boiling water? The Chinese have been drinking tea for thousands of years.
You don’t make tea to kill bacteria. You make it because of the flavour.
Re: The Myth of Medieval Small Beer (2017)
#46Re: The Myth of Medieval Small Beer (2017)
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are. But the solution to each might be different. And given the specific argument being contested here is whether beer was drank because it was considered safer, understanding their motives is pretty fundamental to that discussion.
The motives don't always have understanding of the root cause however. We knew that eating raw meat was unsafe even though we didn't know about salmonella.
Re: The Myth of Medieval Small Beer (2017)
#48This is a great podcast about how Victorian London built a huge sewer system to deal with the vast amount of human waste generated by one of the biggest cities in the world: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001gjcm I was reminded of it by the mention of people who collected the waste from cess pits, which is also in the podcast - it was transported outside the city and used for fertiliser.
Re: The Myth of Medieval Small Beer (2017)
#49of coures the claim they drank small beer alse needs citation.
Re: The Myth of Medieval Small Beer (2017)
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
>People have diarrhoea a lot today, in developed countries with stable access to clean water and food My personal experience suggests it's pretty uncommon. Maybe once every few years, and I eat all sorts of questionable things.
179 million acute cases pa in the US [ https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/28/11/22-0247_article ]. Probably an order of magnitude more unreported cases.
> 179 million acute cases pa in the US
I don't think the US diet qualifies..