Earlier quoted context omitted.
The English language branding on the jar says "Chili Crisp". I'm literally looking at it in my pantry right now because now I wanna make Laoganma and Peanut Butter Toast
They use both terms, "Chili Oil" as well as "Chili Crisp", for slightly different products. I also prefer "Spicy Chili Crisp" but I'd still be happy using "Chili Oil with Fermented Soybeans" in its place for pretty much any dish. Their entirely product lineup has: - "SPICY CHILI CRISP" - "CHILI OIL WITH FERMENTED SOYBEANS" - "HOT CHILI SAUCE" - "FRIED CHILI IN OIL" - "SPICY BEAN PASTE" - "OIL CHILI CONDIMENTS W/MUSHR…
Trademark bully': Momofuku turns up heat on others selling 'chili crunch'
41–44 of 44 posts
Re: Trademark bully': Momofuku turns up heat on others selling 'chili crunch'
#42And chili crunch is obviously not a generic term (WTF is a “crunch”).
Re: Trademark bully': Momofuku turns up heat on others selling 'chili crunch'
#43and i will too!
ianal, but seemingly nobody’s even pointed in the right direction here. momofuku just got done being sued by some denver dingus for use of the term. the resolution of that suit ended up with them being assigned ownership of the mark “chile crunch”. they did not just wake up and decide this was their term and that they should start suing people for fun. once ownership is assigned, though, you have to _actively_ defend it, unless you wanna keep paying more lawyers to fight off more dinguses. basically a game of spoons here.
i don’t think the details of all communications are public, all i’ve seen is assertions that they sent cease and desists, but i don’t think i’ve heard anything about licensing terms? just letting people use the term without asking means dinguses can take a shot, but you can keep defense up by licensing the trademark, which doesn’t have to be at an abusive rate, but does come with terms that would absolutely upset the hell out of a competitor. but again, not really another option.