41–50 of 58 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I really like the effect but im also on safari on a newer macbook this machine is practically made just to render blurs well
Works fine in Safari on my iPhone, too. Curious if Apple is doing something in hardware.
for the average non-gamer your iphone is probably the most powerful computer they own
I personally would rephrase this as "Apple consistently markets their design as great". Apple is probably the best example of how far marketing and PR can get you with fairly run of the mill design.
> Throughout the years, apple consistently delivers great design. They seem to always define (or at least popularize) a new trend, which then storms the world and everyone copies it To the loss of everyone. This is the same company that introduced disappearing scrollbars, just one of many dumb design decisions. What modern design seems to forget, is that at the end of the day, people actually want to USE the interfac…
[1] And yes, because I use it, I obviously agree that the design is one of those classic “form over function” things that shouldn’t have happened in the first place.
> Throughout the years, apple consistently delivers great design. They seem to always define (or at least popularize) a new trend, which then storms the world and everyone copies it To the loss of everyone. This is the same company that introduced disappearing scrollbars, just one of many dumb design decisions. What modern design seems to forget, is that at the end of the day, people actually want to USE the interfac…
It’s quite ironic that we have bigger, higher resolution screens than ever before, and yet we have eschewed visible controls and detail/texture in favour of minimalism and flat design. I get why: design trends from mobile have moved upwards to desktops. But man, I find myself missing Leopard-era macOS design a lot lately.
"402: PAYMENT_REQUIRED Code: DEPLOYMENT_DISABLED
This Deployment has been disabled.
Your connection is working correctly.
Vercel is working correctly."
I always thought of this so-called “progressive blur” as simply being a Gaussian blur with a kernel gradient mask whose channel range was used as the coefficient for the kernel size for a given pixel. So where the kernel gradient mask is 1, you multiply this by the desired max radius blur, down to 0, which represents a radius blur of 0. Edit: Why downvote this? It’s literally how you implement it.
So I always thought it was weird when people complained that Safari was the buggy one holding the web back, since I was always running into Chrome bugs/performance pits instead. (typically Firefox worked great)
This just reinforces my notion that these people complaining developed within their known Chrome constraints (Chrome developers known intuitively what you can't do), and then ran into Safari bugs, whereas if they developed within Safari constraints and then moved to Chrome, they'd run into just as many bugs.
I played around with the idea using the simple single backdrop-filter and had some success with inheriting the border-radius from the parent element onto the caption element. Would that possibly work in your multi-backdrop-filter approach?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Works fine in Safari on my iPhone, too. Curious if Apple is doing something in hardware.
they mostly make it overpowered, iphone processors are a couple years ahead most android flagships for the average non-gamer your iphone is probably the most powerful computer they own
The solution of the author have a big flaw: it render at 5 fps on mobile.
Would this be a practical approach if one needs/wants real-time blur effects? I thought this was primarily for making my website’s static menu background look like it’s behind Vaseline.