Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Study: AI writing, illustration emits hundreds of times less carbon than humans

news.ku.edu

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–50 of 54 posts

Re: Study: AI writing, illustration emits hundreds of times less carbon than humans

#41

Post by exe34 »

xcv123 wrote: post #40
exe34 wrote: post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you think puritanism is such a good way of life, you could always move to Saudi Arabia, Uganda or Texas.

I'm not moving anywhere. I'm just an observer and that is simply what I have observed and experienced in my lifetime. Some women have told me they prefer to be a housewife, but modern society looks down on that. Nothing that I can or will do about that. Natural selection will sort it out. No reproduction leads to extinction. The strongest societies and cultures will survive. We'll see how it plays out over the next f…

Was it UN policy? Was it adopted in a resolution? Or maybe was it that somebody suggested that this might happen in response to that and the other problem might not happen?

Re: Study: AI writing, illustration emits hundreds of times less carbon than humans

#42

Post by xcv123 »

exe34 wrote: post #41
xcv123 wrote: post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not moving anywhere. I'm just an observer and that is simply what I have observed and experienced in my lifetime. Some women have told me they prefer to be a housewife, but modern society looks down on that. Nothing that I can or will do about that. Natural selection will sort it out. No reproduction leads to extinction. The strongest societies and cultures will survive. We'll see how it plays out over the next f…

Was it UN policy? Was it adopted in a resolution? Or maybe was it that somebody suggested that this might happen in response to that and the other problem might not happen?

It was globally implemented in developed countries exactly as the UN recommended, without any local populations being informed or having any say on the matter. It was dictated by some globalist elites. We have an illusion of a democracy.

Re: Study: AI writing, illustration emits hundreds of times less carbon than humans

#43

Post by exe34 »

xcv123 wrote: post #42
exe34 wrote: post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Was it UN policy? Was it adopted in a resolution? Or maybe was it that somebody suggested that this might happen in response to that and the other problem might not happen?

It was globally implemented in developed countries exactly as the UN recommended, without any local populations being informed or having any say on the matter. It was dictated by some globalist elites. We have an illusion of a democracy.

> We have an illusion of a democracy.

No, you don't get to say that and not be laughed at. You can believe it, but you can't claim it. Democracy isn't just voting for what you want or complaining you didn't get a vote. It's also running for office on a platform that you believe is important. Unless you got elected and tried to implement your ideas and men in black came to stop you, you don't get to complain.

Re: Study: AI writing, illustration emits hundreds of times less carbon than humans

#44

Post by xcv123 »

exe34 wrote: post #43
xcv123 wrote: post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was globally implemented in developed countries exactly as the UN recommended, without any local populations being informed or having any say on the matter. It was dictated by some globalist elites. We have an illusion of a democracy.

> We have an illusion of a democracy. No, you don't get to say that and not be laughed at. You can believe it, but you can't claim it. Democracy isn't just voting for what you want or complaining you didn't get a vote. It's also running for office on a platform that you believe is important. Unless you got elected and tried to implement your ideas and men in black came to stop you, you don't get to complain.

You have completely missed the point. Whether I ran for office or not is completely irrelevant.

There are powerful influential people and entities in this world that make far reaching and wide impacting decisions without consulting or informing the public.

You have to be incredibly naive to believe all government officials, corporations, and financial elites are entirely transparent and honest

Re: Study: AI writing, illustration emits hundreds of times less carbon than humans

#45

Post by CatWChainsaw »

xcv123 wrote: post #44
exe34 wrote: post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> We have an illusion of a democracy. No, you don't get to say that and not be laughed at. You can believe it, but you can't claim it. Democracy isn't just voting for what you want or complaining you didn't get a vote. It's also running for office on a platform that you believe is important. Unless you got elected and tried to implement your ideas and men in black came to stop you, you don't get to complain.

You have completely missed the point. Whether I ran for office or not is completely irrelevant. There are powerful influential people and entities in this world that make far reaching and wide impacting decisions without consulting or informing the public. You have to be incredibly naive to believe all government officials, corporations, and financial elites are entirely transparent and honest

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39911909

Perhaps you missed my question the first time. :))))

Are you as upset that young men are "wasting their lives grinding at meaningless soul crushing fake corporate jobs instead of raising families" as you are about women? Or are you just upset that the wimmenz escaped the kitchens they "belong" in?

Re: Study: AI writing, illustration emits hundreds of times less carbon than humans

#46

Post by xcv123 »

CatWChainsaw wrote: post #45
xcv123 wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have completely missed the point. Whether I ran for office or not is completely irrelevant. There are powerful influential people and entities in this world that make far reaching and wide impacting decisions without consulting or informing the public. You have to be incredibly naive to believe all government officials, corporations, and financial elites are entirely transparent and honest

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39911909 Perhaps you missed my question the first time. :)))) Are you as upset that young men are "wasting their lives grinding at meaningless soul crushing fake corporate jobs instead of raising families" as you are about women? Or are you just upset that the wimmenz escaped the kitchens they "belong" in?

That is a good point.

If there were fewer people forced into work, maybe that would cut down the number of pointless/meaningless jobs.

Maybe it is better that only half of a couple are forced into corporate soul crushing jobs. It is subjective. Some women look at child raising / housewife duties as bondage and slavery. Natural selection rewards those who prioritize family. In any case we need generous maternity leave and options for part time employment.

Re: Study: AI writing, illustration emits hundreds of times less carbon than humans

#47

Post by CatWChainsaw »

xcv123 wrote: post #46
CatWChainsaw wrote: post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39911909 Perhaps you missed my question the first time. :)))) Are you as upset that young men are "wasting their lives grinding at meaningless soul crushing fake corporate jobs instead of raising families" as you are about women? Or are you just upset that the wimmenz escaped the kitchens they "belong" in?

That is a good point. If there were fewer people forced into work, maybe that would cut down the number of pointless/meaningless jobs. Maybe it is better that only half of a couple are forced into corporate soul crushing jobs. It is subjective. Some women look at child raising / housewife duties as bondage and slavery. Natural selection rewards those who prioritize family. In any case we need generous maternity leave…

Sooooo.... maybe nobody should be forced into meaningless soul-crushing fake corporate jobs?

Re: Study: AI writing, illustration emits hundreds of times less carbon than humans

#48

Post by xcv123 »

CatWChainsaw wrote: post #47
xcv123 wrote: post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is a good point. If there were fewer people forced into work, maybe that would cut down the number of pointless/meaningless jobs. Maybe it is better that only half of a couple are forced into corporate soul crushing jobs. It is subjective. Some women look at child raising / housewife duties as bondage and slavery. Natural selection rewards those who prioritize family. In any case we need generous maternity leave…

Sooooo.... maybe nobody should be forced into meaningless soul-crushing fake corporate jobs?

From an evolutionary perspective all that matters is that couples reproduce.

Re: Study: AI writing, illustration emits hundreds of times less carbon than humans

#49

Post by CatWChainsaw »

xcv123 wrote: post #48
CatWChainsaw wrote: post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sooooo.... maybe nobody should be forced into meaningless soul-crushing fake corporate jobs?

From an evolutionary perspective all that matters is that couples reproduce.

wimmenz in kitchenz, got it.
Post reply on HN