I really wish we had more concrete information on what caused this. Is this a downturn in gaming and revenue and actually needing to do this to stay afloat or just the company seeing lower than expected sales but still profitable. I know that they announced that the PS5 sold lower than expected but they also mentioned exploring other platforms for their games. Playstation has a reputation of all of their games doing…
Sony Interactive Entertainment lays off 900 people
41–50 of 108 posts
Re: Sony Interactive Entertainment lays off 900 people
#42Is this one of those "we're doing great, you're fired" situations, or is there a real market reason? The PS5 seems to be selling well.
Playstation doesn't appear to be doing poorly, but it's hard to ignore that margins are likely worse than previous generations as AAA game budgets have skyrocketed. In fact, the lifetime sales of PS5 aren't that far behind PS4 (at the equivalent point in the PS4 lifetime). IIRC the insomniac leak contained some internal slides that claimed at least ~6 million full-price sales of Spiderman 2 would be needed to break e…
Re: Sony Interactive Entertainment lays off 900 people
#43I really wish we had more concrete information on what caused this. Is this a downturn in gaming and revenue and actually needing to do this to stay afloat or just the company seeing lower than expected sales but still profitable. I know that they announced that the PS5 sold lower than expected but they also mentioned exploring other platforms for their games. Playstation has a reputation of all of their games doing…
Re: Sony Interactive Entertainment lays off 900 people
#44Setting aside the things I'm feeling when reading this, I'm trying to piece together a picture, for my own curiosity, of this trend, and I'm left with many questions, among those:
* Are all these layoffs meaningfully based in some hard economic data (e.g. end of ZIRP and some real analytical assessments of the direction of the economy)?
* Or, is this some form of corporate herd mentality?
There's no malice in my comment, but I often teeter back and forth between "these collections of smart people are surely doing some data-anchored homework before making these decisions" and "nobody knows what we're doing and the easiest thing is to immediately increase profit, like my friends at that other company!"
I just want to form a more realistic and objective image of how these massive companies operate, whether or not that image may seem optimistic or cynical.
Re: Sony Interactive Entertainment lays off 900 people
#45I really wish we had more concrete information on what caused this. Is this a downturn in gaming and revenue and actually needing to do this to stay afloat or just the company seeing lower than expected sales but still profitable. I know that they announced that the PS5 sold lower than expected but they also mentioned exploring other platforms for their games. Playstation has a reputation of all of their games doing…
Of course they're still profitable. But instead of making a gazillion-and-one dollars, like they "forecasted", they only made a gazillion dollars. So, in the interest of "maximising shareholder value" and maintaining "growth", the board has now concluded that heads must roll for this.
Re: Sony Interactive Entertainment lays off 900 people
#46> In other countries, we will begin conversations with those who are potentially at risk or impacted as a result of this proposed course of action.
what is a "next career support program"? Is it something specific to Japan/required by Japanese law after a round of layoffs?
Re: Sony Interactive Entertainment lays off 900 people
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
I spoke with some console game devs who worked with PS5 title: there is a major problem with AAA title development. Because the games have become so big, it takes 5 years to produce one. The console life cycle is 5 years as well. Thus, as a game studio, you can only cram one AAA title for each console generation. Then you need to start from the scratch with new console, new SDKs, new bugs and so on.
Isn’t the PS5 just a juiced up PS4 at this point? How much is the SDK really changing from generation to generation anymore?
Re: Sony Interactive Entertainment lays off 900 people
#48Is this one of those "we're doing great, you're fired" situations, or is there a real market reason? The PS5 seems to be selling well.
They only recently announced that the PS5 is rapidly reaching its EOL. It is seemingly not selling well at all. The early issues with supply and the lack of actually interesting games that are not just remakes has clearly not helped.
I doubt a company would ever announce a console is EOL befor their next one is on the shelves. Are you sure that wasn’t about the PS4?
Re: Sony Interactive Entertainment lays off 900 people
#49It must be fun to be paid millions to write boilerplate "our incredible journey" garbage and pretend it's serious. They just announced 7% growth sales forecast prior to the layoffs, they aren't a struggling company that needs to buy more runaway. God I just wish one executive had the balls to say, "yeah we're culling 8% of our staff largely randomly because we estimated our dead weight is greater than that." It would…
Re: Sony Interactive Entertainment lays off 900 people
#50I really wish we had more concrete information on what caused this. Is this a downturn in gaming and revenue and actually needing to do this to stay afloat or just the company seeing lower than expected sales but still profitable. I know that they announced that the PS5 sold lower than expected but they also mentioned exploring other platforms for their games. Playstation has a reputation of all of their games doing…
Of course they're still profitable. But instead of making a gazillion-and-one dollars, like they "forecasted", they only made a gazillion dollars. So, in the interest of "maximising shareholder value" and maintaining "growth", the board has now concluded that heads must roll for this.
Part of the problem, of course, is that the pandemic and the economic shutdowns hugely impacted economic output in a way that couldn't be magicked away by printing money and handing out furlough payments - all the furloughed and unemployed workers and shuttered still produced nothing during that time, that unusued capacity could not be saved up for later, and so it wasn't possible for everyone to continue buying the same amount of stuff as before even though goverments in the developed world tried to create the illusion they could. This also created a temporary increase in demand in certain sectors, like video games, which has since vanished.