Earlier quoted context omitted.
> spending time procrastinating is usually more time then just straight up doing it, which is less time on your own goals When it comes to employment, I've never found it actually benefits me all that much to work hard and deliver results early. And it doesn't free me up that extra time to pursue my own goals either. I don't think I'm alone in this.
https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-...
The virtuous mean between time drunkenness and work martyrdom
41–50 of 92 posts
Re: The virtuous mean between time drunkenness and work martyrdom
#42Re: The virtuous mean between time drunkenness and work martyrdom
#43Re: The virtuous mean between time drunkenness and work martyrdom
#44It’s strange that we even work more or even at the same amount of time as 100 years ago. We have systems that increase worker productivity and even software by itself for the most part should be decreasing the amount of work to be done since it’s supposedly a large force multiplier for productivity. Economists predicted we would be working less (but they are bad at predicting most things) so while there might be a fe…
I believe the purpose of life is to create possibility. If that’s true, there will never be an incentive to work less so long as there is more possibility to be created (assuming that people are living purposefully, and it seems to me that those that don’t are evolutionarily selected against)
Also, "creating possibility" sounds kind of like "self actualization" ie. the top of Maslow's hierarchy.
Re: The virtuous mean between time drunkenness and work martyrdom
#45But isn't the flow state also where people forget time exists? And isn't the flow state said to be the most productive state people can be in?
Re: The virtuous mean between time drunkenness and work martyrdom
#46> To be time drunk means to be so “drunk” that one forgets time exists. This forgetfulness is presented as a bad thing, given its inefficiency in the market economy. However, forgetting time is the right move when it comes to sacred considerations. But isn't the flow state also where people forget time exists? And isn't the flow state said to be the most productive state people can be in?
Re: The virtuous mean between time drunkenness and work martyrdom
#47I learned these lessons the hard way. I have, through my life, oscillated from one extreme to the other - at school, this manifested as an utter indifference to lessons, preferring to read under the desk, yet a week of frantic learning in which I would absorb the year or term’s lessons. I was mostly time drunk at this point. Come graduation, I had an urgent need for income, to support both myself and family members w…
Re: The virtuous mean between time drunkenness and work martyrdom
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
The idea that in 1924 people were working 84-hour weeks (including Sunday!) is preposterous. For example Ford introduced the 8-hour day at its factories in 1914.
You were responding to somebody talking about farm labor, by talking about industrial labor. I'm not gonna pick a side here, but to say that what you each present as fact is not in conflict.
Re: The virtuous mean between time drunkenness and work martyrdom
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
//It’s strange that we even work more or even at the same amount of time as 100 years ago. We don’t. A hundred years the average man was putting in 7 to 7 shifts on the factory or the farm. Physically exhausting, dangerous and painful labor that required your physical presence and likely left you too exhausted for anything else. Today you and I are click clacking our keyboards in a safe and air conditioned environmen…
The idea that in 1924 people were working 84-hour weeks (including Sunday!) is preposterous. For example Ford introduced the 8-hour day at its factories in 1914.
Ford could introduce 8 hours long day only because 8 hours a day was far from norm at that time.
Re: The virtuous mean between time drunkenness and work martyrdom
#50It’s strange that we even work more or even at the same amount of time as 100 years ago. We have systems that increase worker productivity and even software by itself for the most part should be decreasing the amount of work to be done since it’s supposedly a large force multiplier for productivity. Economists predicted we would be working less (but they are bad at predicting most things) so while there might be a fe…
//It’s strange that we even work more or even at the same amount of time as 100 years ago. We don’t. A hundred years the average man was putting in 7 to 7 shifts on the factory or the farm. Physically exhausting, dangerous and painful labor that required your physical presence and likely left you too exhausted for anything else. Today you and I are click clacking our keyboards in a safe and air conditioned environmen…
Historically, that is an anomaly that only started with the industrial age [1].
[1] https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/worktime/hours_...