Unfortunately, in the long term, special interests are always going to win, because they can just try over and over until it passes. This is always what happens with these bills: Opponents have to fight it and win every time. Proponents only have to win once. So, chances are, the proponents are going to get their way eventually.
This doesn't sound logical to me. I mean, suppose proponents win once. Stupid protections get enacted. But... can't opponents also get bills proposed, and passed?
Stop KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act)
41–50 of 55 posts
Re: Stop KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act)
#42If we, as a society, were to accept the reality that paying people for their endorsement is only ever used to achieve the effect of fraud without committing it, we could just eliminate paid endorsement.
Extraordinary technological progress has been made in laundering fraud and disinformation, but that technology costs money and therefore requires customers to operate. Eliminate the customers and the sickness they create will go away.
Re: Stop KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act)
#43Summary:
- Establishes a duty of care for covered platforms (basically any internet connected platform (social media, videogames, etc) that isn't a common carrier, an email service, a private messaging service disconnected from any broader platform, VOIP service, VPN, or education related.
- Covered platforms must take reasonable measures to mitigate harms to minors, with a list of specific harms being things like mental illness, addiction, physical violence, bullying, narcotics, and predatory or deceptive marketing tactics. Platforms do not need to hide such content if the minor is specifically searching for/requesting such content, or if the content is providing resources for the prevention of said harms.
-Covered platforms must provide certain safeguards to minors on their platform, to be used at the minor's (or guardian's) discretion. These include blocking, basic privacy settings, opting out of personalized recommendation systems, while still allowing the display of content based on a chronological format or limit types or categories of recommendations from such systems, hiding geolocation, and deleting the account and all associated data.
-The default settings for minors must be the most protective.
-Covered Platforms need to provide parental tools, including the ability to change privacy settings, restrict purchases, view metrics of usage, and restrict the amount of time the minor uses on the platform.
-Covered platforms need a system to receive reports about minor harming on their platform, and must "substantively respond" to such reports withing either 10 or 21 days depending on whether the service has more or less than 10,000,000 monthly active users
-Covered platforms are liable for advertising illegal stuff to minors (including stuff that's only illegal for minors to purchase, like alcohol and tobacco).
Re: Stop KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act)
#44Has anyone found a good explainer about the politics of (and money behind) this and similar legislation? This morning, my city's Axios newsletter contained Instagram sponsorship on the matter, which included this language: "More than 75% of parents agree: Teens under 16 shouldn’t be able to download apps from app stores without parental permission. Instagram wants to work with Congress to pass federal legislation tha…
Re: Stop KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act)
#45It's becoming so hard to constantly keep up the fight against a new bill like this year after year. I guess it is part of the point to try and wear people down over time until they eventually run out of the energy to care. I had not previously heard about this one, but they all sort of run together. Some vague stuff about protecting children which would undoubtedly result in 1) not doing much at all to protect childr…
Re: Stop KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act)
#46The shameful thing about this act is that it has a few good ideas, they're just riding along with a bunch of truly abhorrent ones. If they just axed the entire censorship angle and age verification requirement, and kept the requirement of opt-in (via self-declaration of the user as a minor/guardian account pair) tools for parents and extended the tools available to minors to everybody, I wouldn't even be opposed to t…
Does it even have an age verification requirement? The only part I could find was it requires the NIST to investigate age verification system creation/implementation/effectiveness/impact.
I think that part should be removed but it also made me feel like the stopkosa site might be fearmongering.
Re: Stop KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act)
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Entire generations grew up with polio. There are many good arguments against KOSA; this isn’t one of them.
It's fairly easy to prove the harm from polio. It's not so easy to prove harm from internet access. There are studies that suggest social media can harm adolescent mental health[1] but there are also studies that suggest the magnitude is small enough that we don't really know.[2] It needs more study (and it sounds like what we really need is more transparency from big tech so that it can be better studied). For an ac…
In fact it's quite easy to prove that illegal stuff (for example zlibrary) massively improve at least the chances to learn, and improve lives.
Re: Stop KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act)
#48The bill in question: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/140...
Re: Stop KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act)
#49Pretty silly to do this during an election year. It’s super easy to track who votes for this and put them on my Do-not-vote document I’ve got running. I might have forgotten if they’d done it in an off-year.
Re: Stop KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act)
#50The shameful thing about this act is that it has a few good ideas, they're just riding along with a bunch of truly abhorrent ones. If they just axed the entire censorship angle and age verification requirement, and kept the requirement of opt-in (via self-declaration of the user as a minor/guardian account pair) tools for parents and extended the tools available to minors to everybody, I wouldn't even be opposed to t…
> Nothing in this Act shall be construed to require ... a covered platform to implement an age gating or age verification functionality. Does it even have an age verification requirement? The only part I could find was it requires the NIST to investigate age verification system creation/implementation/effectiveness/impact. I think that part should be removed but it also made me feel like the stopkosa site might be fe…