Live data from Hacker News

Carta: When Your Company Tries to Cancel You

medium.com

41–44 of 44 posts

Re: Carta: When Your Company Tries to Cancel You

#41
post #35
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the point for such leaders, unconscious though it may be, is to feel safe. There's something they're hoping never to have to experience or feel ever again, and this is what they're doing to keep that from happening. It's only ever going to be a temporary solution, but the parts of the person's psyche that are driving these decisions are probably pretty stuck in a difficult time when they felt powerless agains…

Perhaps ethics classes should be replaced with counselling sessions so people can value their demons. Maybe C-suite execs and corporate board members should have mandatory hours of monthly therapy in order to have the power they wield.

You and GP might find the Dark Triad interesting:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad

(Therapy and counseling won't change such personality traits)

Re: Carta: When Your Company Tries to Cancel You

#42
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I read that they'd closed a Series G, I laughed because that's definitely the farthest down the alphabet I've seen anybody go, and it made me wonder if there's even a theoretical limit to where it might stop.

I suppose the theoretical limit would be Z.

Just do what Excel does and wrap around to Series AA, Series AB...

Re: Carta: When Your Company Tries to Cancel You

#44
post #5

Here’s the text: If last week's shit-show was not the end of @cartainc , this definitely is * the sales representative who whipped his dick out at a company event, and was promoted a few weeks later. * you read the texts one manager sent to her Mom about an executive touching her under the table at a work dinner, let alone her claims that she was subsequently “admonished for ‘having her legs out’” and fired after she…

I have no idea whether any of that is true. If it’s not, Carta should sue the hell out them for libel. If it is, wow…

In the original, none of those are cited as his personal observation- all of them are based on (with links to) publicly available news reports on the company, published by reputable news organizations like Business Insider, who presumably have at least a reasonable due-diligence process before they publish, or at least one could make reliance on their having done so.

Basically, I know where I'd put my money on whether they happened, and who ends up looking bad.

Post reply on HN