Earlier quoted context omitted.
They used to run it but stopped (I want to say) around 2016 or 2017. Another poster here linked[0] to how dang confirmed it is to protect against a DDOS attack. 0: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38939668
The cert is Cloudflare today.
Ask HN: Does Cloudflare block HN comments if you have code blocks in a reply?
41–50 of 164 posts
Re: Ask HN: Does Cloudflare block HN comments if you have code blocks in a reply?
#42[flagged]
Re: Ask HN: Does Cloudflare block HN comments if you have code blocks in a reply?
#43So HN uses Cloudflare? That surprises me because typically I notice sites using Cloudflare because my mobile running GNU Linux cannot pass their dreaded Turnstyle. Luckily that does not happen for HN.
It's very easy to disable it completely via Cloudflare settings. Using cloudflare doesn't require you to use all of its features, and almost every feature can be turned off.
Re: Ask HN: Does Cloudflare block HN comments if you have code blocks in a reply?
#44Cloudflare has access to everyone's cleartext? I was unaware of this. NSA must love that
Same for Akamai, Cloudfront, Fastly, etc. Pretty much every business that wants to offload DDOS protection, caching,and some level of frontline security uses a proxying CDN. An alternative is to keep all of your CDN assets on a CDN bucket on its own hostname, with your main secret-containing business apps on your own servers, but it costs a lot to manage this level of separation and the payoff is only protection agai…
Re: Ask HN: Does Cloudflare block HN comments if you have code blocks in a reply?
#45Cloudflare has access to everyone's cleartext? I was unaware of this. NSA must love that
F5 Networks, my former employer, sells something similar, but it's a box (or virtual appliance) you put in your own data centers somewhere that dead-ends the connection instead.
Re: Ask HN: Does Cloudflare block HN comments if you have code blocks in a reply?
#46Re: Ask HN: Does Cloudflare block HN comments if you have code blocks in a reply?
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same for Akamai, Cloudfront, Fastly, etc. Pretty much every business that wants to offload DDOS protection, caching,and some level of frontline security uses a proxying CDN. An alternative is to keep all of your CDN assets on a CDN bucket on its own hostname, with your main secret-containing business apps on your own servers, but it costs a lot to manage this level of separation and the payoff is only protection agai…
That makes using https instead of http a lot less relevant.
The only weak link now is Cloudflare, which is still "less secure than a direct connection" (with respect to government spying, bugs[0], hackers, etc) but the threat level is drastically reduced.
0: https://blog.ryankearney.com/2013/01/comcast-caught-intercep...
Re: Ask HN: Does Cloudflare block HN comments if you have code blocks in a reply?
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same for Akamai, Cloudfront, Fastly, etc. Pretty much every business that wants to offload DDOS protection, caching,and some level of frontline security uses a proxying CDN. An alternative is to keep all of your CDN assets on a CDN bucket on its own hostname, with your main secret-containing business apps on your own servers, but it costs a lot to manage this level of separation and the payoff is only protection agai…
That makes using https instead of http a lot less relevant.
Re: Ask HN: Does Cloudflare block HN comments if you have code blocks in a reply?
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
AFAIK most of these filters are disabled by default when setting up your website on Cloudflare, so most websites using the Cloudflare network likely have this turned off.
This is correct, it’s part of their WAF offering where there is rule-based blocking of content.
Re: Ask HN: Does Cloudflare block HN comments if you have code blocks in a reply?
#50So HN uses Cloudflare? That surprises me because typically I notice sites using Cloudflare because my mobile running GNU Linux cannot pass their dreaded Turnstyle. Luckily that does not happen for HN.
edit: my memory is crap. it was a single machine, but the codebase was written in a custom experimental language that i think was a lisp derivative. (which would make sense!). the source was online at some time, can't find it now.