Live data from Hacker News

Why Would I Buy This Useless, Evil Thing?

aftermath.site

41–50 of 94 posts

Re: Why Would I Buy This Useless, Evil Thing?

#41
post #4

I don't even think it's properly monetizable, it needs a lot of juice in the backend.

That's what I don't get here that worries me. It feels either like a ticking time-bomb to deprecation, and/or a privacy nightmare if they're somehow selling data they mine from their users.

Re: Why Would I Buy This Useless, Evil Thing?

#42

Teenage Engineering does interesting and good work. Similar to Kano, they have very good modern design ideas and they produce actual devices. That's the best thing about this useless evil thing. It exists in the world and can provide inspiration for others to work on. Another positive-ish thing to say would be is that this device is likely going to increase in value. Not because its popular but because it is going to…

[deleted]

Re: Why Would I Buy This Useless, Evil Thing?

#45
post #34

I dislike and object to the scope of this device as much as the author. It's not a popular view, but I hope Teenage Engineering is acquired by a very large company soon so that they can be relegated to functioning somewhere as a harmless novelty devision. This way they will get a big pay day and be treated like a prize, while their influence to create proprietary devices for the landfill is effectively quashed.

[deleted]

Re: Why Would I Buy This Useless, Evil Thing?

#46
post #32

The idea is fine, but the inevitable outcome here is that Apple and Google do the same thing in their respective smartphones and this device (if it's even good at all) is obviated.

It's a funding/VC grab. I'll look forward to the "Our incredible journey" post a couple of years from now.

I would be astounded, astonished, and amazed if Apple doesn't have Siri++ in development to do exactly this, but with more guardrails.

Re: Why Would I Buy This Useless, Evil Thing?

#47
post #2

My question is what happens when you veer off the happy path for a given task? Like if your hotel cancels, or thinks you didn't pay and you did? Seems like disasters waiting to happen.

I wouldn't even trust that it had booked the hotel on the correct date, or with my breakfast or room preferences. I'd need to go double check everything it did anyway, so what's the point.

The accuracy problems will eventually be solved. The point is to remove you from the decision making process of spending your money and delegate that to the institutions who want your money. Sure, the itinerary looks good, but since you haven't actually planned it yourself you don't know what the tradeoffs are. This is the end-goal of capitalism, extract the most value from people and resources as possible, and launder all of the anti-competitive and scam-adjacent behaviors through "the algorithm!" Just like how the police launder racist policies through statistics and terrible facial recognition or predictive policing software.

Re: Why Would I Buy This Useless, Evil Thing?

#48
post #14

I'm not even here for the "AI creation" horseshit. I just want a better general assistant that's smarter than Siri that can handle task-keeping, calendaring, and reminders better. And I like that it's "push to talk". It listens on my command, not on the whims of a voice query in mid-air. I'll give this a crack because I'm part of the weird population that likes "stand-alone" appliances for things. It's got a certain…

I use push to talk on the action button on iPhone on the rare occasions I try to make Siri do something for me. I refuse to say 'Hey Siri' like a twit.

Re: Why Would I Buy This Useless, Evil Thing?

#49
For those of you who argue that a device like this is useless I urge you to visit someone with Parkisons, essential tremors, ALS, rheumatoid arthritis, limb injuries etc as well as very low vision and observe the difficulty they have interacting with the vision + multi-touch interface of their phones.

Re: Why Would I Buy This Useless, Evil Thing?

#50
> I resent AI. Not AI itself–that’s just code, despite what tech guys with flashlights under their chins tell you.

What this based guy doesn't realize is that recognizing that complex neural networks are "conscious" is precisely the way to stop companies from abusing them for everything.

Also, is it just code? Can you show me the code that lets an LLM reason in the way it does? You'd have just as much luck pointing to the neurons that let a human do that. If it WAS just code, it'd be GOFAI (Good Old Fashioned AI) -- a literal algorithm. That's code. And that'd be better since it would be something we could understand and troubleshoot, not a magic black box of brute forced insane computing power that megacorps and nation states can monopolize.

Post reply on HN