Earlier quoted context omitted.
We can’t filter out human generated garbage. Not sure how AI will be easier.
maybe we can ask the AI to filter it
dangGPT
ChatGPT for Teams
41–50 of 453 posts
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#42A major change is that you cannot opt out from having your conversations used for training unless you are usig a team account which is pretty costly for a single person.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is ChatGPT, not OpenAI's API with the gpt4 models. This is allowing your team to use chat.openai.com together, rather than having to build or deploy your own with the API.
Yes but even in ChatGPT the training is not done ?
Be default they train on user data and cripple the product in various ways if you opt out.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#44I can see some good use cases
- A custom gpt just trained on your code base can help you write test cases in your desired syntax.
- A custom gpt trained on internal PRDs can help brainstorm better on the next set of features.
Hoping to see something good come out of this
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#45[dead]
Mixtral is nowhere near gpt4. Forefront uses OpenAI or Anthropic (whose models aren't fantastic either).
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#46Ok, so there are now 2 tiers where they don't use our data to train the model? The higher bandwidth is to clearly entice new customers, but the question remains, what happens to the old ChatGPT Plus users? Do their quotas get eaten up by these new teams?
Looks like the $20/month PLUS plan DOES use your data to train the model now... (they seem to have removed that "feature" from the list in the side-by-side comparison)
There used to be a form you could submit asking them not to train on your data. Absent some communication to the contrary I would hope that continues to be respected.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#47Pricing: $25 per user/month billed annually $30 per user/month billed monthly
[deleted]
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#48At the end of the day I wonder what openai's endgame is here. They're starting to expand their business in a way that geometrically grows the size of the team, overlapping products that microsoft is offering, making the whole non-profit/capped-profit thing a head scratcher. I guess you can argue this is just a marginal add-on to their existing ChatGPT product but I can imagine seeing them go full Salesforce/Oracle/en…
It’s pretty obvious that once they realized how much money was on the table, the “non-profit” aspirations and goals went out the window. The Altman saga from a few months ago painted this clearly.
How much money is on the table?
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#49Pricing: $25 per user/month billed annually $30 per user/month billed monthly
Why would they make it more expensive than individual plans?
1 point by phantomathkg 0 minutes ago | parent | next | edit | delete [–]
https://openai.com/chatgpt/pricing It is very clear on the highlight.
* Higher message cap. * Create and Share GPTs within workspace. * Admin console. * No training.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#50At the end of the day I wonder what openai's endgame is here. They're starting to expand their business in a way that geometrically grows the size of the team, overlapping products that microsoft is offering, making the whole non-profit/capped-profit thing a head scratcher. I guess you can argue this is just a marginal add-on to their existing ChatGPT product but I can imagine seeing them go full Salesforce/Oracle/en…
> At the end of the day I wonder what openai's endgame is here Sell AI products to fund making AI
At some point I think there is a conflict though, the more powerful the AI models, the more risk there is to their own business.