This story keeps popping up on HN and elsewhere. And the common solution I've read is "Please, just get a standup desk!" as if standing up and not moving is healthier than sitting and not moving. I've seen no study that supports that conclusion. I think the message should be: moving is healthier than not moving, which is hardly news.
Standing keeps postural musculature (those you use to keep balance upright) active. So even standing still is way more activity than simply sitting where postural muscles just do nothing. I wonder whether "active sitting" [e.g., sitting on a ball, or just sitting correctly (upright, instead of leaning on the back of the chair -- imagine sitting upright on a chair without the back)] has the same negative effect.
Confirmed: He Who Sits the Most Dies the Soonest
41–46 of 46 posts
Re: Confirmed: He Who Sits the Most Dies the Soonest
#42This story keeps popping up on HN and elsewhere. And the common solution I've read is "Please, just get a standup desk!" as if standing up and not moving is healthier than sitting and not moving. I've seen no study that supports that conclusion. I think the message should be: moving is healthier than not moving, which is hardly news.
http://health.yahoo.net/experts/menshealth/most-dangerous-th... "British researchers found that (sitting) bus drivers were twice as likely to die of heart attacks as (standing) trolley operators." The idea is that bus drivers and trolley operators are similar in all the other important respects (e.g. socio-economic backgrounds).
Re: Confirmed: He Who Sits the Most Dies the Soonest
#43This reminds me of another correlational study I was tickled pink to read, and I just had to quote it in one of my essays http://www.gwern.net/Nicotine#fn7 : > "…Based on these figures, and expected deaths from all causes, the authors calculated that an individual who spends a lifetime average of six hours a day watching TV can expect to live just under five fewer years than someone who does not watch TV. These figur…
I know the above is pretty much common sense, but it just always annoys me whenever the topic of "dying an average of X years sooner" comes up.
Re: Confirmed: He Who Sits the Most Dies the Soonest
#44What about lying down doing work on a laptop in bed?
Re: Confirmed: He Who Sits the Most Dies the Soonest
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a "40% higher risk", not a 40% risk.
So, how high is the risk if out of 1000 people, nobody died due to sitting?
But more importantly - this research was done on people over the age of 45, your 1000 people were aged 5-24. Using your age range I imagine we could prove that smoking 60 a day and eating McDonalds for every meal isn't particularly dangerous.
Re: Confirmed: He Who Sits the Most Dies the Soonest
#46This was a statistical work from data on 220,000 people in a large Australian longitudinal study, and it claims to show that sitting time correlates with increased mortality independently of level of physical activity. Some thoughts: http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2012/04/sitting-time-corr... This is not the first study to propose this correlation, of course. There are a range of others from past years. One has t…
It makes me worry that participant self-reporting cannot seriously be considered a reasonable way to measure levels of physical activity.
At least, not without research specifically designed to validate it for that purpose. Which might exist. I really haven't looked into it. If it does, please ignore all previous inane babble.