Live data from Hacker News

Cybertruck Launch

tesla.com

41–50 of 592 posts

Re: Cybertruck Launch

#41
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No more or less than any other vehicle of similar weight.

The thing weighs 8000 to 10000 lb (3629 to 4536 kg). That’s shockingly heavy to move around 200lbs meat sacks.

Twice the weight of the Tesla model 3 which is 1800kg, it's pretty extreme.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Model_3

Re: Cybertruck Launch

#42
post #24
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No more or less than any other vehicle of similar weight.

> vehicle of similar weight All...one of them: https://www.usatoday.com/picture-gallery/money/cars/2019/10/...

Your link lists 6 trucks that are heavier than the 6,670 Ibs two motor version of the cybertruck.

Re: Cybertruck Launch

#43

I’m still somewhat on the fence. But it’s looking pretty good: https://www.theautopian.com/i-saw-a-production-spec-tesla-cy...

I would suggest exercising caution in using that article as a guide post. The car the author is inspecting is literally the model Tesla chose to put on the showroom floor in front of customers and the general public. I'm sure they ensured it had no major flaws.

Re: Cybertruck Launch

#46
post #6
post #3

I'm rooting for it despite it being silly and not a practical pickup, strictly because every car people are buying looks identical (picture a crossover SUV from Toyota, Chevy, BMW etc. Basically shoe-shaped things). This looks like a concept car that would never come to market. I hope it sells really well and convinces others to bring actually-creative designs to market.

Tesla literally didn't realize the steel comes in coils and it naturally wants to warp back into that state. Massive panel gap problems. As usual. The only thing other car makers are learning is what a joke their design operation is.

It also has to be much thicker, or needs to be bonded to a backing frame for rigidity.

Re: Cybertruck Launch

#47
I understand the nostalgia for those rock solid steel bumpered behemoths people used to drive. Knocking your bumper on the curb and shelling out a few grand for some plastic sucks. But think just for a moment about how the physics of that equation work out. There's 3 tons of rolling steel coming to a stop, and something's gotta give. It's either the car, or you.

Best of luck to anyone who drives ones of these. I'll be interested to see the NHTSA results.

Re: Cybertruck Launch

#48
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No more or less than any other vehicle of similar weight.

The thing weighs 8000 to 10000 lb (3629 to 4536 kg). That’s shockingly heavy to move around 200lbs meat sacks.

It does not weigh 8000 to 10000 pounds. It is listed between 6500 and 7000.

Re: Cybertruck Launch

#49
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While I appreciate the unique design of the Cybertruck, I have a huge concern with its huge size and the potential safety risks for pedestrians. The trend of increasingly larger vehicles, like SUVs and trucks, has already raised issues regarding pedestrian safety. The Cybertruck, being notably larger than most contemporary cars in the same category, could exacerbate this problem, especially if it opens the door to si…

It should be safer than a normal truck to pedestrians, since it doesn't have a broad front. With a car, the most common scenario is that car hits your legs and then you bounce on the hood. IOW, you don't get the full kinetic energy all at once. With a truck your body takes the full hit and you're more likely to fall under the tires. With a lower, sharper front, the Cybertruck should behave more like a car than a full…

It is the single biggest step backwards in automotive safety in the last ten years.

https://www.travelers.com/resources/auto/safe-driving/how-cr...

Post reply on HN