So your company will be generating 94% of the value instead of 6%?
Reverse YC funding program. PG, what's your thought?
41–50 of 65 posts
Re: Reverse YC funding program. PG, what's your thought?
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hire developers for 2 months and work on the apps. Invest 15,000 for development like PG maybe. I mean guy launched truemors for 12K
And Truemors is a piece of shit. And Guy is famous. 15K is enough when you have motivated founders who own half the company and are willing to eat ramen and sleep on cots for 3 months to realize their dreams. It is not enough to hire the equivalent programming talent for 3 months to work on an idea by non technical founders.
Re: Reverse YC funding program. PG, what's your thought?
#43You haven't launched your startup yet, but in 20 months you will be financially set from its sale?
Re: Reverse YC funding program. PG, what's your thought?
#44The problem is, sales and marketing people generally don't have good ideas for startups. Because they're not masters of the medium, they don't know what's possible.
Call me crazy but it feels good to have PG comment. To get back to your comment, I respectfully disagree. that is like putting a limit to the power of thought. Think about manufacturing. How many clothing line make millions of dollars and are highly successful, but the founder can't even use a sewing machine. Same for moms who make millions because they thought of a crazy fork-knife combined and hired a manufacturer…
How many people think designing software is as easy as designing a spork?
Re: Reverse YC funding program. PG, what's your thought?
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
i ll answer that when you answer what exactly is "talented developer/programmer". We can both write books on the subject.
The only riff raff you get will be unsuccessful sales/marketing people. Your basically going to be paying for an idea. I am inexperienced but from what I have read, ideas are not worth a whole lot... I would hope that the answer to your question is farely obvious......
Re: Reverse YC funding program. PG, what's your thought?
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hire developers for 2 months and work on the apps. Invest 15,000 for development like PG maybe. I mean guy launched truemors for 12K
I don't think that would work too well. You'd need to find a few exceptionally talented hackers that would be interested in helping a variety of founders implement their ideas technically for a significant stake (eg 6%) in the company. I'm not sure there's anyone who can code that much. Realize also that Y Combinator doesn't discriminate against non-technical people, except that the applying company has to have at le…
All I want is to have step 1.5 get someone who understand your vision to help you build the alpha.
Re: Reverse YC funding program. PG, what's your thought?
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
And Truemors is a piece of shit. And Guy is famous. 15K is enough when you have motivated founders who own half the company and are willing to eat ramen and sleep on cots for 3 months to realize their dreams. It is not enough to hire the equivalent programming talent for 3 months to work on an idea by non technical founders.
Would you like to bet on it
Re: Reverse YC funding program. PG, what's your thought?
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Call me crazy but it feels good to have PG comment. To get back to your comment, I respectfully disagree. that is like putting a limit to the power of thought. Think about manufacturing. How many clothing line make millions of dollars and are highly successful, but the founder can't even use a sewing machine. Same for moms who make millions because they thought of a crazy fork-knife combined and hired a manufacturer…
Unless you're a celebrity, how many people have clothing lines can't design clothes? How many people own restaurants and don't know how to cook? How many people think designing software is as easy as designing a spork?
Re: Reverse YC funding program. PG, what's your thought?
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Call me crazy but it feels good to have PG comment. To get back to your comment, I respectfully disagree. that is like putting a limit to the power of thought. Think about manufacturing. How many clothing line make millions of dollars and are highly successful, but the founder can't even use a sewing machine. Same for moms who make millions because they thought of a crazy fork-knife combined and hired a manufacturer…
Unless you're a celebrity, how many people have clothing lines can't design clothes? How many people own restaurants and don't know how to cook? How many people think designing software is as easy as designing a spork?