> We will shortly be reaching out to the abuse desk of the affected ISP for assistance. Does anyone here have experience working with an ISP in abuse cases like this one, specially a Chinese ISP?
If it's one ISP you don't work with them, you simply add a `drop` rule for their IP range. I think this article is misleading; there's nothing terribly "distributed" about the DoS.
Arxiv.org is experiencing a DDoS attack
41–49 of 49 posts
Re: Arxiv.org is experiencing a DDoS attack
#42Who would have the incentive to bring arxiv down?
Re: Arxiv.org is experiencing a DDoS attack
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doesn't change the point. Also doesn't refute the point.
The original suggested "Gatekeepers who hate open access." The example was actually a Gatekeeper who values peer review before publication.
Additionally, Arxiv won't kick you off their platform if you post a preprint there, and then you get published in Nature.
In other words, the reason it does not change the point is that Arxiv does not weaken the publication process for the actual journals the preprint will be submitted to. You still need peer review to get published and you are still incentivised to do just that.
You could argue 'preprints ARE publishing' but I'd need to be convinced of that point because I don't agree for the reasons stated above.
Re: Arxiv.org is experiencing a DDoS attack
#44> We will shortly be reaching out to the abuse desk of the affected ISP for assistance. Does anyone here have experience working with an ISP in abuse cases like this one, specially a Chinese ISP?
If it's one ISP you don't work with them, you simply add a `drop` rule for their IP range. I think this article is misleading; there's nothing terribly "distributed" about the DoS.
Re: Arxiv.org is experiencing a DDoS attack
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
and the context really isn't "gatekeepers hate open access", is it.
The context is that the author of the tweet hates fast paced open research (which IMO is a net good for humanity) and makes up the strawman `"can't keep up" + "anything older than 6 months is irrelevant" in CS` quotes to justify that position. There's timeless beauty in CS, but there's also a lot more fertile ground for research in CS, given how young the field is compared to the older sciences.
and I've offered at least as much evidence as you have.
Re: Arxiv.org is experiencing a DDoS attack
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
What school has 200k engineering students?
It was from about 10 accounts. Which we suspended. But it appears that they created new accounts overnight (daytime in China). arXiv is not well-equipped to play whack-a-mole. And 10 accounts using 100 different IP addresses, would seem unlikely for an innocent project. And creating new accounts ...
Re: Arxiv.org is experiencing a DDoS attack
#47A million password resets is shockingly low for a DDOS, could this have been an university assignment gone wrong? I can imagine some clueless dean ordering all their engineering grads to submit research to arXiv. If they have 100-200K students, a single poorly written script to link the institution's SSO with automatically created arXiv accounts could easily overwhelm the system.
What school has 200k engineering students?
Re: Arxiv.org is experiencing a DDoS attack
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, no reply from the ISP so far.
Have you tried blocking only endpoint for the IPs in question? Happy to help discussing mitigation techniques. Long time user of ArXiv. Email in Bio.
Re: Arxiv.org is experiencing a DDoS attack
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you tried blocking only endpoint for the IPs in question? Happy to help discussing mitigation techniques. Long time user of ArXiv. Email in Bio.
Sorry qmarchi -- I don't know how to get your contact information here. But it shouldn't be too hard to find mine, if you try.