Live data from Hacker News

CT scans of coffee-making equipment

scanofthemonth.com

41–50 of 178 posts

Re: CT scans of coffee-making equipment

#41
post #34

This has to be a marketing exercise by the CT machine maker, right? "We spotted casting issues with the new pot" "We can see the density difference in the plastic" "We found aluminum shavings" For the right audience, this would definitely sell one of those big fancy CT machines. Not that I'm complaining -- visuals, presentation, content is all thoroughly interesting, speaking as someone with an Aeropress, a Moka. Pre…

Yes, in the about us page they say it is "powered by" Lumafield.

Re: CT scans of coffee-making equipment

#42

Such a cool idea, and attractive images. However I’m kind of disappointed they mostly picked things that are fairly simple, transparent or openable, and look exactly the way you’d expect them to inside. I assume some combination of cost & size drove this. A vintage espresso machine with 1 group head would be more novel, for example.

You just reminded me there's a video on youtube of a guy literally tearing a Juicero apart and it's hilarious: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Cp-BGQfpHQ

Thank you for posting this. I've seen it a few times already, but I'm watching it again, and it's cracking me up, yet again.

Re: CT scans of coffee-making equipment

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Proper storage is just pulling the plunger out entirely. Every few years, soaking the rubber seal in mineral oil overnight then cleaning will restore flexibility (otherwise it shrinks over time, reducing the quality of the seal). Unrelated: using paper filters is less eco-responsible than the gold foil filter, but makes for better coffee.

I've never maintained or replaced the seal on mine in over ten years, and it still seals just fine. It's made from silicone rubber, which is extreme durability even when continuously exposed to temperatures above boiling or strong acids/bases. As used in the AeroPress where it's just sitting at room temperature indoors for 99% of the time, durability is at least 20 years. I also use a metal filter, but just for the t…

My first one had to replaced after about 6 or 7 years. The plunger rubber had gotten worn down, and the internal wall of the brewing compartment had become blistered from hot water (I used 170-185F water). The new one with different materials seems to be holding up better.

Re: CT scans of coffee-making equipment

#44
I got a kick out of this passage:

> At times, Fourth Wave innovations verge into the realm of obsession, making you wonder how much real difference all of this precision makes to a cup of coffee. At the end (or beginning) of the day, coffee is a ritual. More than mere caffeine delivery, these technologies enable a multi-faceted sensory experience. Exploring the complexity of its flavors and aromas has transformed coffee from an article of consumption into an open-ended object of scientific and aesthetic experimentation.

Re: CT scans of coffee-making equipment

#45
post #22

Interesting images and a very well put together page. But a little off topic, I was struck by this: > With the powerful 1200 W heating element A typical European kettle is at least 1800 W, comfortably less than the power deliverable from a 10 A, 230 V circuit. A typical UK kettle would be more like 3000 W, such as this one (it seems that all the kettles on that website are 3 kW): https://www.argos.co.uk/product/93631…

> …the kettle reaches optimal temperature very quickly — in under three minutes That’s too long to wait for a brew.

Any amount of time feels like too long to wait for a brew ever since I got one of these:

https://www.zojirushi.com/app/category/water-boilers-warmers

(To answer the question an inquisitive reader may ask: the keep-warm setting of the model I have uses about 25-60 watts average at room temp 73degF/23degC depending on volume and selected water temp) [1, pg5]

[1]: https://www.zojirushi.com/servicesupport/manuals/manual_pdf/...

Re: CT scans of coffee-making equipment

#46

I got a kick out of this passage: > At times, Fourth Wave innovations verge into the realm of obsession, making you wonder how much real difference all of this precision makes to a cup of coffee. At the end (or beginning) of the day, coffee is a ritual. More than mere caffeine delivery, these technologies enable a multi-faceted sensory experience. Exploring the complexity of its flavors and aromas has transformed cof…

I love that way of thinking about it. I wish I thought about more things as more than just the bland day-to-day they seem to be on the surface.

Re: CT scans of coffee-making equipment

#48

> Compared to flat burrs, conical burrs also create a more uniform particle size distribution, reducing the potential for clogs and jams Well this is just...not true. Porlex musta sold them pretty hard on Conicals.

I've always thought that about conical burrs, but I guess I've never seen anyone actually look at them under a microscope either

Re: CT scans of coffee-making equipment

#49
post #22

Interesting images and a very well put together page. But a little off topic, I was struck by this: > With the powerful 1200 W heating element A typical European kettle is at least 1800 W, comfortably less than the power deliverable from a 10 A, 230 V circuit. A typical UK kettle would be more like 3000 W, such as this one (it seems that all the kettles on that website are 3 kW): https://www.argos.co.uk/product/93631…

> …the kettle reaches optimal temperature very quickly — in under three minutes That’s too long to wait for a brew.

Reduce the pressure! :)

Re: CT scans of coffee-making equipment

#50
post #14

I thought X-rays do not pass through metal? Like it shows up opaque in clinical images. Suprised that they got a scan of the moka pot. Truly amazing stuff.

Entire aircraft engines and rocket engines can in fact be x-rayed (google image search awaits you). Granted if you stuck your hand in there it would definitely get cooked. The power levels are much higher.

If you really want to dive down a rabbit hole, look up how they image welds on pipelines... literally inject radioactive gas between two cardboard/clay plugs and tape an xray film on the outside of the weld for an hour or two.

Post reply on HN