Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yet requesting the removal of a content only to satisfy one's emotional immaturity is an attempt to limit this freedom.
Not tolerating sexist jokes isn't emotional immaturity. Especially in a very sexist industry and in a sexist society where making these jokes about women is somehow seen as okay by way too many men. It's not funny. I have values (such as those of respect and equality) that stand in opposition to childish jokes like that one. You don't and that's okay, but don't go painting others as "immature" when you're unwilling t…
HCSL: Hand coded stringy lisp
41–50 of 61 posts
Re: HCSL: Hand coded stringy lisp
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right? I'm really blown away by the amount of people on here that seem to think this is a serious sentiment.
mmm ... i should start my readme as "> black people are always late." it just isn't acceptable even though that's an inside joke where/how i was raised. have some empathy. not everyone is going to get it and it's your responsibility to understand that. no context was explicitly given other that it's quoted so we may or may not attribute the comment as the perception of the README author
Re: HCSL: Hand coded stringy lisp
#43It's a good idea to reduce templating languages into a simpler form, I'll agree to that, but the issue here is that you still need loops and data input. For example, the test script has a 'li' function but s are list items and they reside, usually more than one, inside or elements. At the very least, there should be a way to take some form of data file (list of blog posts and nested metadata) an iterate over it. Othe…
`(map li (eval "cat file"))`
Where `file` is newline separated text, and li is applied to each line, and the full string is returned.
For this example ``` (func ul "{0}") (func li "{0}") (ul (map li (eval "cat file"))) ``` Would return each line of the file nested in a `li` tag nested in a `ul`
Re: HCSL: Hand coded stringy lisp
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not tolerating sexist jokes isn't emotional immaturity. Especially in a very sexist industry and in a sexist society where making these jokes about women is somehow seen as okay by way too many men. It's not funny. I have values (such as those of respect and equality) that stand in opposition to childish jokes like that one. You don't and that's okay, but don't go painting others as "immature" when you're unwilling t…
[flagged]
Re: HCSL: Hand coded stringy lisp
#45Re: HCSL: Hand coded stringy lisp
#46Re: HCSL: Hand coded stringy lisp
#47Have you thought about adding car, cdr, and cons? You wouldn't need to shell out to subprocesses if you had the full list of minimal lisp primitives. Technically you also need cond, eq?, and pair? (because car and cdr only take pairs not symbols).
Re: HCSL: Hand coded stringy lisp
#48While Lisp is my preferred normally my go-to language, tbh I think sed or awk are probably adequate and, already being installed, probably in some sense “better”. That being said, thanks for posting this; it made me think.
Re: HCSL: Hand coded stringy lisp
#49[dead]
Genuine question. Is it because it's sexist? Would it be appropriate to write "unlike most men"? Unlike most people?
Or is it because it's suggesting the author is better than other people???
Re: HCSL: Hand coded stringy lisp
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yet requesting the removal of a content only to satisfy one's emotional immaturity is an attempt to limit this freedom.
Not tolerating sexist jokes isn't emotional immaturity. Especially in a very sexist industry and in a sexist society where making these jokes about women is somehow seen as okay by way too many men. It's not funny. I have values (such as those of respect and equality) that stand in opposition to childish jokes like that one. You don't and that's okay, but don't go painting others as "immature" when you're unwilling t…