Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's in progress https://nitter.net/skdh/status/1684917544103116800 There will be a live stream once the material is ready apparently. Related Twitter space recording available https://twitter.com/andrewmccalip/status/1685465431317114880 (That's the only one I'm aware of. There may be more)
Actual twitch content here: https://www.twitch.tv/andrewmccalip Twitter is members-only, a private site. Better to post the primary, public, source.
“We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
41–50 of 71 posts
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#42Honestly, just send out the samples and have people verify the claims. Demonstrating Meissner effect can be done by a grad student, especially if you don't need a pressure cell or low-temperature setup.
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#43All of this is just noise. The experiment has to be reproduced and measured by others. Then we will know.
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you follow that rabbit hole you find that the Nazis had this whole batshit crazy alternative science. It was sort of like Lysenkoism in spirit (an ideologically conforming “alternative truth”) but zanier and wilder. Think hollow Earth and mystical traits of the Aryan race and such. I heard a historian once describe the SS as “what you would get if you made the Church of Scientology a branch of the military.” The N…
>in spite of Stalin having a similar body count Not even close. In the XX century Mao leads generously, followed by Stalin and Hitler is the distant 3rd.
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#45All of this is just noise. The experiment has to be reproduced and measured by others. Then we will know.
The worst about it is how much of other people's time their wasting. Other folks are trying to verify/disprove their claims. Of course it is some kind of measurement error. Do your due diligence before you claim that you broke physics as we know it. All these people could be spending their time working on something worthwhile...
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's in progress https://nitter.net/skdh/status/1684917544103116800 There will be a live stream once the material is ready apparently. Related Twitter space recording available https://twitter.com/andrewmccalip/status/1685465431317114880 (That's the only one I'm aware of. There may be more)
Actual twitch content here: https://www.twitch.tv/andrewmccalip Twitter is members-only, a private site. Better to post the primary, public, source.
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, I guess. I'm not at all surprised there's this much drama around this. It sounds like it's a matter of a little time and we'll know what's going on. > Einstein's Relativity was called "fake Jew science". Thankfully, along the way, we discovered that "Jew Science" is quite good. I imagine an alien civilization visiting the Earth at that time trying to make sense of…
If you follow that rabbit hole you find that the Nazis had this whole batshit crazy alternative science. It was sort of like Lysenkoism in spirit (an ideologically conforming “alternative truth”) but zanier and wilder. Think hollow Earth and mystical traits of the Aryan race and such. I heard a historian once describe the SS as “what you would get if you made the Church of Scientology a branch of the military.” The N…
Also, he was an ally and posed in historical pictures celebrating history with his good friends, Churchill and Roosevelt. It took a while to overturn good rep like that.
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#48Honestly, just send out the samples and have people verify the claims. Demonstrating Meissner effect can be done by a grad student, especially if you don't need a pressure cell or low-temperature setup.
How many samples do you think they have?
It’s obvious there’s a limited number of samples and they potentially don’t feel like they have a complete grasp on how to reliably produce more using their current level of knowledge regarding the process they used to create the first one… sometimes science involves luck. They have been working on this for years, I can completely believe a non-trivial portion of that time was spent trying to go from a fluke to having at least some ability to produce samples that demonstrate superconducting properties.
They may have only a half dozen samples of varying purity and quality…
The samples may not be particularly “strong” and given the powder based process involved may be too brittle to safely “send” and thus require careful hand courier delivery like a fresh organ for transplant, just without the urgency…
It’s entirely possible they may be mistaken and it’s not a superconductor, but these people are not fools, so I’m inclined to “give them enough rope” and to let this all play out and see where the either falter and the falsehoods exposed by the absence of any further evidence, they are are shown their mistakes once others get their hands on samples, other’s reproduction proves them correct, or their samples are studied by others and the evidence from their paper proves to be correct regardless of novel theories regarding the mechanism of superconductivity involved.
Science is a process, and to be honest it’s fun watching how fast people are pouring on the gas and trying to find out if this is real or not … stark contrast to the abject scepticism and shoestring budgets given to many innovative potential ideas.
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#49I'm out of the loop, can someone please provide ELI5ed context for this?
Korean scientists announce room-temperature superconductor. Ridiculous amounts of squabbling over who invented it immediately ensue, even though the jury's still out on whether it even works. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LK-99 The part I don't understand is why they don't just FedEx a sample of the stuff to another lab, so they could replicate the results immediately.
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#50All of this is just noise. The experiment has to be reproduced and measured by others. Then we will know.
The worst about it is how much of other people's time their wasting. Other folks are trying to verify/disprove their claims. Of course it is some kind of measurement error. Do your due diligence before you claim that you broke physics as we know it. All these people could be spending their time working on something worthwhile...
Do room temperature semi conductors break physics as we know it? I didn’t think they contradicted known physics, which is why so many people were researching them.
What known physics do they break?