I think it was this level of effort to deceive about their abilities, as well as the clear evidence that Maria did not write the letters or engage with the received items, that sunk any claim that people ‘knew’ what they were buying into.
A copywriter swindled victims out of $200M by pretending to be a psychic
41–50 of 89 posts
Re: A copywriter swindled victims out of $200M by pretending to be a psychic
#42Is this really a swindle if your "victims" are willing participants? Every purported psychic is "pretending" even if they don't realise. My sister in law makes good money giving readings over zoom. She genuinely believes in this nonsense, as do her customers. Is there a practical difference though, whether she believes it or not?
Re: A copywriter swindled victims out of $200M by pretending to be a psychic
#43Is this really a swindle if your "victims" are willing participants? Every purported psychic is "pretending" even if they don't realise. My sister in law makes good money giving readings over zoom. She genuinely believes in this nonsense, as do her customers. Is there a practical difference though, whether she believes it or not?
The victims paid for personal readings from a specific person, and got mass-produced ones from someone else instead. Psychics are bullshit, but that's an extra level of fraud on top, and far more actionable by law enforcement.
Re: A copywriter swindled victims out of $200M by pretending to be a psychic
#44Is that it? Is the lack of overt signal they "believed" what makes this bad because I would suggest, they were a clever psychic who did what all psychics did, they just did it better.
Re: A copywriter swindled victims out of $200M by pretending to be a psychic
#45Re: A copywriter swindled victims out of $200M by pretending to be a psychic
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
The victims paid for personal readings from a specific person, and got mass-produced ones from someone else instead. Psychics are bullshit, but that's an extra level of fraud on top, and far more actionable by law enforcement.
I'm reminded of Robert Tilton, who was exposed for depositing/trashing prayer requests/donations without actually praying over them. Sadly it seems like he largely escaped intact. I suspect being a grifter is a very strong risk factor for being too lazy to grift 'correctly', no matter how easy it would be.
Re: A copywriter swindled victims out of $200M by pretending to be a psychic
#47Re: A copywriter swindled victims out of $200M by pretending to be a psychic
#48Is this really a swindle if your "victims" are willing participants? Every purported psychic is "pretending" even if they don't realise. My sister in law makes good money giving readings over zoom. She genuinely believes in this nonsense, as do her customers. Is there a practical difference though, whether she believes it or not?
Willfully and knowingly defrauding someone is worse, yeah. Also giving "readings" and making vague comments / giving advice is very different from promising health outcomes.
Re: A copywriter swindled victims out of $200M by pretending to be a psychic
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm reminded of Robert Tilton, who was exposed for depositing/trashing prayer requests/donations without actually praying over them. Sadly it seems like he largely escaped intact. I suspect being a grifter is a very strong risk factor for being too lazy to grift 'correctly', no matter how easy it would be.
[flagged]
If you’re that stupid, you deserve to be swindled.
The victims included mentally compromised people, the elderly, people who later committed suicide, etc.It's hard for me not think this sort of behavior is anything but criminal.
Re: A copywriter swindled victims out of $200M by pretending to be a psychic
#50Is this really a swindle if your "victims" are willing participants? Every purported psychic is "pretending" even if they don't realise. My sister in law makes good money giving readings over zoom. She genuinely believes in this nonsense, as do her customers. Is there a practical difference though, whether she believes it or not?
It is legal for scientology to solicit donations from their followers. It's even legal for the Catholic Church to solicit tithes. If the party benefitting believes their own story then quite a lot seems to be legal.