https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35456309/
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/...
41–50 of 127 posts
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35456309/
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ... significant economic coercision meets my definition of force Military members are vaccinated against a myriad of illnesses right after joining . They are also required to follow a bunch of rules, some of which severely restrict the practice of their first amendment rights. They weren't "forced", as much as they have to agree with the DoD rules to work for them.
We should at least acknowledge the "trolley" problem here. You have two bad choices: join the marines or live in poverty. The US has a "volunteer" force but "volunteer" is a stretched euphemism in my mind. There aren't many people with options "volunteering" for the marines. Obligatory "I'm pro vaccine".
The fact that the military lifts people out of poverty is a great thing. It's a damned hard life being in the military, especially if you make a career out of it. But four years of service with a decent shot at an education and solid employment when you get out is a fair trade.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lol. Have you been in a news blackout for the last year? Denying it at this point is equivalent to being a flat earther or something. Read the Twitter Files from Tabibi, Weiss, Shellenberger etc. The evidence is all there.
don't you mean the X Files? It certainly fits, a show all about fictionalized conspiracies
Interesting. Funny how wrong the Community Note was. Obviously vaccine × virus aren't an xor . Many people have already had the virus by the time they were forced to take the vaccine. For those people the myocarditis risk was a strict net negative.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[citation needed]
Lol. Have you been in a news blackout for the last year? Denying it at this point is equivalent to being a flat earther or something. Read the Twitter Files from Tabibi, Weiss, Shellenberger etc. The evidence is all there.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Okay, but this is still an implied accusation with zero evidence. Surely losing the "benefit of the doubt" doesn't mean you can just make up any story you want about someone and use that to demonize them until there's definitive proof your accusation is wrong?
Life is not just this or that. Life is also highly likely this or likely that. When you have a track record and make a lot of people have this image about you, many people will operate on highly likely’s or likely’s about you. Musk is no exception.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
don't you mean the X Files? It certainly fits, a show all about fictionalized conspiracies
So all those twitter and government agencies that sent emails saying they were doing it were.. what? Cosplaying and writing fictional emails for LOLs?
https://www.techdirt.com/2023/06/05/twitter-admits-in-court-...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
[citation needed]
EDIT: So there you have it.
Even when I have given citations and substantiated them with links, I still get censored for it for no reason because it is true. Of course.
Cannot begin to even reason with the folks here who cannot handle the facts and citations given at all.
[0] https://www.melovedata.com/twitter-still-hasnt-unlocked-the-...
[1] https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/hunter-biden-emails-show-lever...
I’m surprised when I see people uncritically repeating the claim that Twitter now aims for “free speech.” It’s clear that was never true and always meant “Speech Elon wants to allow.”
Earlier quoted context omitted.
People who wanted to keep their job, friends and family. It's disgusting.
I'm forced to wear pants in public at all times. If I showed up to Thanksgiving with no pants, they'd ask me to leave and id never get invited again. Tyranny ! Everyone should be free to endanger everyone around them with a deadly crippling virus at all times.