41–50 of 64 posts
Also similar to everyone's response when asked: "What do _you_ think your punishment should be?"
>current industry frontier >Dalle 2 I'm sorry OpenAI, but your model is not the frontier; also it's funny that it's the only text-to-image models mentioned, they probably know how better the other models are.
Yes there are so many better ways to produce ethically dubious, derivative trash.
Moving AI governance "forward" - means working on eliminating the competition via regulatory capture, censoring and blackholing any facts they don't like, and preserving the economical status quo with enriching themselves. None of this will protect against actual risks like massive job losses without any reskilling, lowering of living standards and widespread censorship.
Worrying about censorship and job losses is so myopic my eyes are cringing just thinking about it. This is akin to a ship sinking while people are blocking the hallways and fretting about how their makeup looks and where they put their jewelry at. It's so maddeningly absurd there's no point in even discussion, shove them in the nearest cabin and out of the way so the serious people can get on with it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Worrying about censorship and job losses is so myopic my eyes are cringing just thinking about it. Why? I'm not concerned about censorship, but I am deeply concerned about the potential economic fallout. Why shouldn't I be? I would genuinely love to have one less worry on my plate.
Technology advances have happened many many times in history. But there is always more work to be done. I was reading Man’s Search For meaning, written shortly after ww2. The author notes that Americans have too much free time. Clearly that is not the case 80 years later.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Worrying about censorship and job losses is so myopic my eyes are cringing just thinking about it. This is akin to a ship sinking while people are blocking the hallways and fretting about how their makeup looks and where they put their jewelry at. It's so maddeningly absurd there's no point in even discussion, shove them in the nearest cabin and out of the way so the serious people can get on with it.
This kind of mentality is going to blowback on AI researchers very quickly. When the job losses start mounting politicians are going to need a very persuasive answer as to why we should let millions of people be thrown onto the streets so that a few can become absurdly rich. We will either: have a well-thought out, empathetic plan to resolve this issue, or the mob will burn down the data centers. Your choice.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes there are so many better ways to produce ethically dubious, derivative trash.
I don't think they meant better in the artistic sense but in the sense that they outperform on metrics?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Worrying about censorship and job losses is so myopic my eyes are cringing just thinking about it. This is akin to a ship sinking while people are blocking the hallways and fretting about how their makeup looks and where they put their jewelry at. It's so maddeningly absurd there's no point in even discussion, shove them in the nearest cabin and out of the way so the serious people can get on with it.
This kind of mentality is going to blowback on AI researchers very quickly. When the job losses start mounting politicians are going to need a very persuasive answer as to why we should let millions of people be thrown onto the streets so that a few can become absurdly rich. We will either: have a well-thought out, empathetic plan to resolve this issue, or the mob will burn down the data centers. Your choice.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Turns out that this wouldn't stop others from building it.
Right? That’s why I continue kicking kittens. If I don’t, someone else will. It better be me, because I’ll kick them real gentle.