Excited to see this finally rolled out. Now just waiting on the foreign key constraint support.
This is the only thing that is stopping me from trying PlanetScale. I can't imagine not having the database do this work for me
PlanetScale Scaler Pro
41–44 of 44 posts
Re: PlanetScale Scaler Pro
#42Am I missing something in the pricing or is the Storage costs very unappealing. For anything with a usage skewed towards high ratio of storage to usage, the costs aren't competitive. 2.5$ per GB in "Scalar" and 1.5$ per GB in "Scalar PRO" compared to 0.11$ RDS for General purpose (or 0.125$ for provisioned + the IOPS you use, double that for multi-az), Supabase at 0.125$, Firebase at 0.1725$,DynamoDB at 0.25$, MongoD…
> Am I missing something in the pricing or is the Storage costs very unappealing
Yes, there's no comparison on the IOPs or anything else and what counts as storage. They all count slightly differently and so unless you account for it all it's a bit moot.
AWS alone has different tiers of storage from HDD to NVME ssd. The pricing varies greatly.
RDS will literally count anything including temporary files as usage of storage. Planetscale claims not to.
Re: PlanetScale Scaler Pro
#43Excited to see this finally rolled out. Now just waiting on the foreign key constraint support.
It's on its way!
This is great news. I strolled around https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/issues/12967.
Are there any public discussions of more trade-offs vitess has to make to enable fks?
Re: PlanetScale Scaler Pro
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's on its way!
This is great news. I strolled around https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/issues/12967 . Are there any public discussions of more trade-offs vitess has to make to enable fks?