Live data from Hacker News

Sublime Text 2 Build 2181

sublimetext.com

41–50 of 115 posts

Re: Sublime Text 2 Build 2181

#41
Reading some of the comments here, it's evident that planet Emacs, where I'm from, is in a galaxy a long ways away from planet "I give a shit about the icons".

Sounds like the guy behind the project is quite responsive, and doing a good job for a good price, but I'm just way too attached to having open source tools for my work.

Re: Sublime Text 2 Build 2181

#42

For the first time I am seriously considering whether to replace Emacs as my primary text editor on Linux. I've been compulsively using Emacs for the past 5 years. Thanks to Emacs I felt in love with (a dialect of) Lisp and experienced the freedom brought by a truly programmable text editor. An enlighting experience. About a couple of weeks ago I began using Sublime Text 2 and... wow, it gets so many things right and…

You're not alone. I've used Emacs for over a decade, but I fell in love with ST2 almost immediately. And although it may cost me some cred with diehard Emacs users: I'd much rather extend my editor with Python than elisp.

Still, Emacs is my bus factor backup plan. I prefer ST2 today, but it's nice knowing there's a pretty darn excellent fallback if it disappears for some reason.

Re: Sublime Text 2 Build 2181

#43
post #9

My main objective with Sublime is to master the keyboard shortcuts. Stuff like (on the PC) Ctrl+D to select the current word, and repeat for next occurrences. This starts up a multiple-selection that you can just type and all selected occurrences are replaced. I forked a GitHub Gist from others and tweaked it a bit, for reference to useful shortcuts: https://gist.github.com/1736542

That reference is super useful. If you're on a Mac you can substitue Ctrl for cmd.

there's also this for Mac

https://gist.github.com/1839777

Re: Sublime Text 2 Build 2181

#45
I'm using ST2 for CoffeeScript/js development, and Visual Studio with ReSharper for backend C# development. The difference is night and day -- it feels like ST2 is designed with the sole goal of helping me write code as fast as possible with as little friction as possible. I used to wish that Visual Studio supported tmbundles, now I'm trying to figure out how to fit a C# development process into ST2.

Re: Sublime Text 2 Build 2181

#47
post #40

On Windows you can't do much better, all the paid text editors are crap (Textpad anyone?), and Notepad++'s plugin system falls short of Sublime's (hot installation vs. restarting). As usual another fantastic build.

Komodo Edit/IDE is a good choice also.

Re: Sublime Text 2 Build 2181

#48

Oi, that is a rough looking icon. There is a severe lack of contrast. The one from this article http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tools-and-tips/sublime-tex... is worlds better.

I'm fine with the new icon, but it really does look like a rush job. IconFactory has done better.

Re: Sublime Text 2 Build 2181

#50

Oi, that is a rough looking icon. There is a severe lack of contrast. The one from this article http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tools-and-tips/sublime-tex... is worlds better.

My only real complaint with the icon is that the perspective is completely out of place. See it compared to everything else on my Dock: http://sta.sh/01giwsf26wey
Post reply on HN