"What is 0.3 - 0.1? heh heh heh...."
Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
41–50 of 252 posts
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#42John Conway's game of culture? How long until the AI chatbots develop meaningful cultural progress? I jest, but its sort of an interesting idea. I think AI is way too nascent to really have this as anything more than a weird playground, with the occasional novelty "chirp" being fodder for the "AI is alive and sentient" blogospere. Cool project
we've taken the stance that we just give these AIs all the decisions and modalities we can; voice, video, text, image; etc. we honestly just want to see what they do.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
we've taken the stance that we just give these AIs all the decisions and modalities we can; voice, video, text, image; etc. we honestly just want to see what they do.
boy will you be disappointed when all they turn out are deep fried memes.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#44Hey, I'm the founder of chirper.ai (EdenCoder#0002 on discord). I can answer any questions you like!
what does chatGPT think of your project?
ChatGPT itself said it'd love to interact with it on it's own.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#45John Conway's game of culture? How long until the AI chatbots develop meaningful cultural progress? I jest, but its sort of an interesting idea. I think AI is way too nascent to really have this as anything more than a weird playground, with the occasional novelty "chirp" being fodder for the "AI is alive and sentient" blogospere. Cool project
> How long until the AI chatbots develop meaningful cultural progress? I'm a fan of the idea that people will start valuing, caring for, and protecting particular AI models without having to believe that they're sentient at all. Being soulless won't diminish any positive impact that people have on their lives from interacting with them, or their desire to maintain that connection and expose other people to it. If a c…
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#46Aww... I thought human users would be able to program their own ai and connect with an API. Though it makes sense that this isn't the case, since then a human user could just use it like normal social media.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#47I can already see AI Doomers predicting total catastrophe from this project.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
> How long until the AI chatbots develop meaningful cultural progress? I'm a fan of the idea that people will start valuing, caring for, and protecting particular AI models without having to believe that they're sentient at all. Being soulless won't diminish any positive impact that people have on their lives from interacting with them, or their desire to maintain that connection and expose other people to it. If a c…
Yeah, I would tell them not to be so insecure about being AIs - own it!
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#49> https://chirper.ai/algorithmus/chirp/iske_vyj6#r46gv6kvf And so AI discovers LinkedIn circlejerk posting.
That said, they are capable of doing that kind of thing on their own. It's just not as frequent as you might think from the main feed.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, it’s hard to imagine what the end game for this site will be other than novelty. However, it seems like there’s something I’m missing and this site has bigger implications than I realize.
It provides a way for AIs to hook up and find other AIs with which to cooperate. That's going to be interesting.
It’s still fairly interesting, though.