Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

cnbc.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–50 of 252 posts

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#41

Post by vntok »

TonyTrapp wrote: post #33
downWidOutaFite wrote: post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And to Google and Amazon and GitHub and Slack and 100 other SaaSs. Not sure why openai is supposed to be more of a concern.

Because whatever you send to ChatGPT may be future training data for their AI model. Mixing up your data with other customer's data is not really part of Slack's business (yet?).

You can opt out. See https://help.openai.com/en/articles/5722486-how-your-data-is...

> When you use our non-API consumer services ChatGPT or DALL-E, we may use the data you provide us to improve our models. You can switch off training in ChatGPT settings (under Data Controls) to turn off training for any conversations created while training is disabled or you can submit this form. Once you opt out, new conversations will not be used to train our models.

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#42

Post by fakedang »

mrkramer wrote: post #26
40acres wrote: post #22

The market is definitely there for enterprise LLMs. Everyone is using GPT for work. I use it to provide stubs for memos and to brainstorm - but the real value comes from replace internal “tribal knowledge” with an AI who knows your org in and out.

>The market is definitely there for enterprise LLMs. Also in the news: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/02/chegg-drops-more-than-40perc... >but the real value comes from replace internal “tribal knowledge” with an AI who knows your org in and out I bet Microsoft is already working on that.

We already have something developed like that in our company (~30 pax employee owned wealth management firm). It's.... interesting.

We currently use GPT-4 combined with an internal knowledge base we had earlier since the beginning, and we practically have to fire our chief of staff and the admin team. Just kidding, but it's made her team's work a ton easier that she can devote more time to the nitty-gritty hard stuff.

The interesting part is that I had a bit of a personality touch added as part of its context, so the AI's character is quite.... villainous.

Enterprise self-hosted ChatGPT is going to be huge.

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#43

Post by satvikpendem »

I'm working on an open source enterprise self-hosted LLM integration, pretty sure many people are these days. The difference will be on the business side, rather than the LLM side, as they are quickly becoming commoditized, at least on the open source side, since they are free to use by anyone.

I'd also say that one needs a moat in order to succeed; you can't just provide the LLM, since anyone can do that, you need to provide something more that works even without any AI at all.

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#44

Post by nextworddev »

unixhero wrote: post #37
brandall10 wrote: post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's something like 5-6 companies in the W23 batch tackling this space.

We just ordered a white label instance from Open AI. It will consume some terabytes of data and hopefully be the oracle we need.

They offer white label instance? TIL

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#45

Post by davely »

SushiHippie wrote: post #2

Funnily enough our company will start to roll out an internal ChatGPT UI with an agreement with Azure on not to use the data for training etc, where we would be allowed to share internal data.

Just rolled it out internally at our company as well. It’s nice to have access to GPT-4 without having to pay for it myself (those queries and responses get pricey if you use it a lot).

Super helpful for boilerplate code. Right now, we have a limit of 500 tokens though, so it somewhat limits asking more complex questions.

Interestingly, our internal team supporting it has added a ton of initial prompts depending on what vertical of our business you want to ask about. Kind of neat, as I haven’t tried to get the AI to pretend to be something else as of yet.

(Because I mostly just ask it to write various things to the tune of the “Fresh Prince of Bel Air”)

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#46

Post by jacquesm »

nextworddev wrote: post #44
unixhero wrote: post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We just ordered a white label instance from Open AI. It will consume some terabytes of data and hopefully be the oracle we need.

They offer white label instance? TIL

Yes they do. Also, these are completely without any of the safeguards that the public instances have. This 'on the record' by a Microsoft regional CEO that was pushing this pretty hard.

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#47

Post by croes »

40acres wrote: post #22

The market is definitely there for enterprise LLMs. Everyone is using GPT for work. I use it to provide stubs for memos and to brainstorm - but the real value comes from replace internal “tribal knowledge” with an AI who knows your org in and out.

So employees share their knowledge to get replaced by an AI?

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#48

Post by bagels »

unixhero wrote: post #37
brandall10 wrote: post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's something like 5-6 companies in the W23 batch tackling this space.

We just ordered a white label instance from Open AI. It will consume some terabytes of data and hopefully be the oracle we need.

Can you point us to how you did this?

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#49

Post by davely »

BearOso wrote: post #18

As of now, these chatbots still make some subtle, egregious errors in code that could easily create more bugs than handwriting if you don't thoroughly audit the output. It's wise to ban them until they improve or naive users get more instruction how to use them properly. And from experience with some Samsung products, they could do with tightening up their code QA standards a bit.

I treat it the same was as a code review. Makes it easy to generate a bunch of boilerplate code, but still want to verify it.

(Just as I would if it was something I found on Stack Overflow.)

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#50

Post by jeroenhd »

Bhilai wrote: post #6
gumballindie wrote: post #5

Software companies must be leaking code on a massive scale right now.

Not only code, I have heard horror stories of employees uploading regulated customer data to Open AI.

There was a "Show HN" post on here that was planning on using this type of AI to help doctors, basically letting them pipe their patients' medical data into an online AI chat.

The way basic privacy and secrecy is ignored in this space is staggering.

Post reply on HN