Live data from Hacker News

Hetzner EX 4S Unixbench, dd and htparm results

gist.github.com

41–45 of 45 posts

Re: Hetzner EX 4S Unixbench, dd and htparm results

#41
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I never meant to criticise, I saw that they have ECC-servers as well, I just wondered what the implications would be if running a database on a non ecc server, as I've never really understood how much damage it could cause.

Short answer: ECC will save you from having corrupt data written to your database if one of the DIMMs are corrupt.

Or more importantly, if cosmic rays hit your data in the wrong way.

Re: Hetzner EX 4S Unixbench, dd and htparm results

#42
post #23
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is this being downvoted? The processor used (i-7 2600) does not support ECC RAM, and this platform does not include it. A server platform without ECC RAM is a pretty big disadvantage for several reasons, to most compelling being the high real-world rate of memory errors in real systems. Memory errors in non-ECC systems can be extremely difficult and expensive to track down, and can cause data corruption or loss i…

What would be the downside to using non ECC RAM in a heavily loaded server? Would it cause processes to crash?

As someone who runs physical servers for hosting, you really get what you pay for.

I've had non-ECC RAM systems destroy database tables leading to data loss.

Systems with ECC are either able to correct the error (and log it), or throw the alarm bells. Even discounting RAM bit flips, simple bad RAM can destroy your data. Having an ECC aware system (including getting Linux to check the EDAC or have the baseband monitor do so) has saved me many times from failing hardware.

Re: Hetzner EX 4S Unixbench, dd and htparm results

#44
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually it's a really fair comparison, for the price of the AWS service you can buy 9 hetzner instances. So you don't need to spin anything up, just buy it. A long term contract is the perfect comparison because it's a similar service, you know you'll be using the capacity so you pay up front to have it 'reserved' and in exchange receive reduced prices. Normally with EC2 you'd buy 1 instance and then spin up 8 more…

You and your sibling posters are all focusing on my point about scaling. Fair enough, maybe the fact that it's so much cheaper means that point is moot. That still doesn't mean that it's a fair comparison. EC2 has plenty of other features out-of-the-box like the ability to manage security groups, VPNs, elastic IPs, easy access to other AWS offerings like SQS and S3, the ability to treat images and the machines they'r…

I'd agree with that, if you need those services it may make fiscal sense if you have few enough servers.

Re: Hetzner EX 4S Unixbench, dd and htparm results

#45
post #5

Apples / Oranges. Quite apart from the ability to buy by the hour, the Hetzner offering really isn't suitable for processing any data you care about - it's not using ECC RAM, and the processor used doesn't support it.

You can get the one with ECC (EX 6) it's just 10euro extra / per month... which is still away cheeper than AWS.
Post reply on HN