Earlier quoted context omitted.
You get better divider flexibility with the columns. You basically can divide it in half (6 columns each), in thirds (four columns each) in fourth (three columns each), in 6th (two columns each and in all 12 plus of course spanning the entirety. 16 gives you only 1, half,
Any recommendations on how to use grids? I've seen them talked about but I don't actually know what to do with it. How does it help you?
Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback
41–50 of 87 posts
Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
You get better divider flexibility with the columns. You basically can divide it in half (6 columns each), in thirds (four columns each) in fourth (three columns each), in 6th (two columns each and in all 12 plus of course spanning the entirety. 16 gives you only 1, half,
Any recommendations on how to use grids? I've seen them talked about but I don't actually know what to do with it. How does it help you?
Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for the tip! That looks a lot better now.
is this: http://paste.ly/pastes intentional?
Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Any recommendations on how to use grids? I've seen them talked about but I don't actually know what to do with it. How does it help you?
You can line up every element in your design without figuring out and writing widths and margins for every element by hand. You just assign one of the provided class names and you automatically get the desired result.
Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback
#45Does anyone know why LESS was picked over SASS for Bootstrap?
While Less and Sass are really similar products that do pretty much the same thing; I switched my site from initially using Sass (scss) to now using Less for three reasons: a) Bootstrap uses less and I'm using bootstrap. b) It was trivial to go from sass to less. Mostly just renaming files to have the right suffix. c) I'm sure someone can argue differently, but I really think that the mixin syntax for Less is signifi…
Odd, it says that lessc can take --compress, but using the most recent version of less in npm says that there's no such flag.
Maybe it's on the way, or the bootstrap authors know something we don't.
Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can line up every element in your design without figuring out and writing widths and margins for every element by hand. You just assign one of the provided class names and you automatically get the desired result.
So how do you find what to adjust in the CSS? Just read through it until you figure it out? For example, if I wanted to make four columns instead of three?
.span3
= render :partial => "col1"
.span3
= render :partial => "col2"
.span3
= render :partial => "col3"
.span3
= render :partial => "col4"
Or, to do 3-col: .span4
= render :partial => "col1"
.span4
= render :partial => "col2"
.span4
= render :partial => "col3"
Nothing in the partial needs to especially care about the grid (as long as its simple) --- but if it wanted to, it could nest columns.Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can line up every element in your design without figuring out and writing widths and margins for every element by hand. You just assign one of the provided class names and you automatically get the desired result.
So how do you find what to adjust in the CSS? Just read through it until you figure it out? For example, if I wanted to make four columns instead of three?
Want something on your page to be 3 columns wide? ...
Want to make it 4 columns wide instead? ...
Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
You get better divider flexibility with the columns. You basically can divide it in half (6 columns each), in thirds (four columns each) in fourth (three columns each), in 6th (two columns each and in all 12 plus of course spanning the entirety. 16 gives you only 1, half,
Any recommendations on how to use grids? I've seen them talked about but I don't actually know what to do with it. How does it help you?
Basically you need look at your design in order to determine what would make most sense.
A very popular choice is to divide it into three equal sizes and then have one of them be the right or left column, while the two others combine to form the other column.
So you end up with two columns one for content and one for navigation (typical blog look)
Grids can obviously also be much more complicated as those used in photoshop, 3dmax, word or windows/osx.
If you want to get really into grids I can recommend probably the best book written about them.
Josef Muller Brockman Grid Systems
http://www.amazon.com/Systems-Graphic-Systeme-Visuele-Gestal...
Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bootstrap and backbone are great together. I wish there was more concrete tutorials on getting the two to play nice, but all I could find was bits and pieces about both. Even with that I have managed to knock out a few prototypes fairly easily.
Any twitter bootstrap tutorials you can recommend, beside just using inspect element in Chrome console?
Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
While Less and Sass are really similar products that do pretty much the same thing; I switched my site from initially using Sass (scss) to now using Less for three reasons: a) Bootstrap uses less and I'm using bootstrap. b) It was trivial to go from sass to less. Mostly just renaming files to have the right suffix. c) I'm sure someone can argue differently, but I really think that the mixin syntax for Less is signifi…
http://markdotto.com/bs2/docs/less.html Odd, it says that lessc can take --compress, but using the most recent version of less in npm says that there's no such flag. Maybe it's on the way, or the bootstrap authors know something we don't.