Live data from Hacker News

Sal Khan explains SOPA / PIPA

khanacademy.org

41–50 of 67 posts

Re: Sal Khan explains SOPA / PIPA

#41
post #27
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He is saying that there are a lot of sites that offer services which could enable or facilitate pirating, because the terms 'enable' and 'facilitate' are not particularly limited in scope. It seems clear to me.

That are "primarily designed or operated" for pirating, and have "only limited purpose or use other than" pirating? What are some examples of such sites?

I don't know of any that conform to what you said. There are plenty that fall under the scope of the wording of the law, however. The second use of the word "pirating" is you interpretation. I have no guarantee that others will make that same interpretation.

Re: Sal Khan explains SOPA / PIPA

#43
post #12
post #2

Sal showed up at our weekly company picnic/lunch today and said something like, "All these sites are down cuz of SOPA, but everything I read is still so hard to understand," so he dove in and made this this morning. Pretty cool.

I am convinced that Sal Khan's contribution to education is so significant his work will be used in classrooms generations from now... though perhaps in the form of some kind of technological derivative. So congrats! You just had lunch with the historical equivalent of Einstein.

> So congrats! You just had lunch with the historical equivalent of Einstein.

kamens is the lead dev at Khan Academy, so such lunches are not a rare thing for him. :)

Re: Sal Khan explains SOPA / PIPA

#44

Linking is not a crime. If we'll ever make any "Internet Freedom" laws or Constitutional Amendments, that definitely needs to be in there. The 1st Amendment should already cover linking as speech, but apparently MPAA/RIAA and some in Congress disagree.

Linking most definitely is already a crime in the US. The time to protest it was eleven years ago: http://www.2600.com/news/view/article/299

Every move in defense of liberty on the Web since then has been a rear-guard action.

Re: Sal Khan explains SOPA / PIPA

#45
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not a lawyer, but it certainly sounds like his examples fit. Here's the text: [A site is illegal if] the U.S.-directed site is primarily designed or operated for the purpose of, has only limited purpose or use other than, or is marketed by its operator or another acting in concert with that operator for use in, offering goods or services in a manner that engages in, enables, or facilitates [various illegal stuff]…

Your second left parenthesis belongs one line higher. A more clear way to read it is to write out four copies of it, and then in the first copy delete or clauses 2, 3, and 4. In the second copy delete or clauses 1, 3, and 4, and so on. That gives a separate complete sentence for each of the four ways you can run afoul of that section: A site is illegal if] the U.S.-directed site is primarily designed for use in offer…

YouTube fails to fall under the first because it is not primarily designed to engage in, enable, or facilitate infringing

In whose opinion? Viacom's?

Re: Sal Khan explains SOPA / PIPA

#46
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that he's got some great recognition. The Nobel and Pulitzer aren't the only way to do that.

yes he has, but probably deserves more.

The Nobel Prize has a famous chilling effect on actual productivity. It's good to give people recognition for their work but I would be wary of giving them too much.

Re: Sal Khan explains SOPA / PIPA

#48
post #2

Sal showed up at our weekly company picnic/lunch today and said something like, "All these sites are down cuz of SOPA, but everything I read is still so hard to understand," so he dove in and made this this morning. Pretty cool.

Congress should hire him to explain to them all the laws they are creating.

Re: Sal Khan explains SOPA / PIPA

#49

We need S.O.P.A: Stop Outrageous Political Assholes. Did anyone here see the letter from the CEO of the MPAA (who happens to also be a senator) chriss dodd today, which said that this SOPA blackouts are a gimmick and that we are corporate pawns for blacking out in protest? Is it enraging to anyone else that he is allowed to be the CEO of the MPAA AND a senator at the same time where he can both write and benefit from…

United States Senator from Connecticut In office January 3, 1981 – January 3, 2011 On March 1, 2011, the Motion Picture Association of America announced that Dodd will head that organization He's not a senator anymore and was never senator and MPAA Chairman at the same time. I know wikipedia is "down" so it's harder to check facts. [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Dodd?banner=false ]

Thanks!

I have heard his name enough in the media recently, associated with the credit crisis, as referred to as senator, that I hadn't realized he was out.

Still does not reduce my level of disdain for him.

Re: Sal Khan explains SOPA / PIPA

#50
post #4
post #2

Sal showed up at our weekly company picnic/lunch today and said something like, "All these sites are down cuz of SOPA, but everything I read is still so hard to understand," so he dove in and made this this morning. Pretty cool.

I find it really disappointing that the informational response to SOPA has been quantitative and not qualitative. Everyone and their dog have made (1) an infographic, (2) a video, and (3) a black-out or banner script. This only serves to underscore what so many people don't get most of the time: the availability of information is not binary nor an issue necessarily aided by a proliferation of resources on the matter.…

Oooh oooh! Brilliant!

Do you think we can get him to do a module on git?!

Post reply on HN