Live data from Hacker News

Apple avoids job cuts because it didn’t overhire like Google and Amazon

bloomberg.com

41–50 of 439 posts

Re: Apple avoids job cuts because it didn’t overhire like Google and Amazon

#41

A few days ago we were criticizing Nintendo because it was making too much money per employee and didn't hire enough. Also, we criticize Google for laying people off and Amazon for everything else (overhiring?). One wonders why Apple gets high praise for "hiring cautiously".

Tech management has such a hard-on for headcount it is sickening. It is like the managers brag about how many people are under them.

Re: Apple avoids job cuts because it didn’t overhire like Google and Amazon

#42
post #28
post #22

Apple got burned bad the last time they were caught organizing a wage fixing cartel: https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-tech-jo... It's different this time around though, because economy. The tech layoffs started at the least profitable companies with the weakest balance sheets first (Google, Microsoft), and besides the whole economy is doing massive layoffs because of the recession and high interes…

> the whole economy is doing massive layoffs because of the recession "U.S. reports blowout job growth; unemployment lowest since 1969" https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-job-growth-accelerates-j...

I probably should have added /s :)

Re: Apple avoids job cuts because it didn’t overhire like Google and Amazon

#43
Apple is known for going with tiny teams rather than the gigantic, bloated trees of VPs and Directors that other companies have. Their CFO even spoke[1] publicly about it, a rarity. Sometimes you just need a team of two people reporting to the CFO to do something. You don't need 2 SVPs, with 10 VPs, with 80 Directors, each with trees of management/ICs to do the same thing.

1: https://twitter.com/workmj/status/1595324607984271360

Re: Apple avoids job cuts because it didn’t overhire like Google and Amazon

#44
post #32

Apple's underlying economics haven't changed, so they have not had any reason to over-hire in the first place. Amazon, Google, Meta, Shopify and others are all e-commerce based. There was a clear trend that e-commerce had shifted up due to the pandemic, and looked to be permanent. That bet was wrong, so they all had layoffs. Other companies were willing to hire lots of developers because the ROI on devs was good comp…

> Meanwhile, Apple has a mostly-stable massive chunk of the consumer device market and has always had a profit margin that is startlingly high. Not much has changed as far as they're concerned.

Apple had a big bump in pandemic-related revenue too, inspired by mass WFH hardware purchases. And now Apple revenue has gone down as well: https://sixcolors.com/post/2023/02/apple-results-and-charts-...

Re: Apple avoids job cuts because it didn’t overhire like Google and Amazon

#45
post #32

Apple's underlying economics haven't changed, so they have not had any reason to over-hire in the first place. Amazon, Google, Meta, Shopify and others are all e-commerce based. There was a clear trend that e-commerce had shifted up due to the pandemic, and looked to be permanent. That bet was wrong, so they all had layoffs. Other companies were willing to hire lots of developers because the ROI on devs was good comp…

Amazon, Google, and Meta all seem to make riskier bets, too.

Both strategies make sense—make big, risky investments, or grind out more profits in existing, highly lucrative markets.

Re: Apple avoids job cuts because it didn’t overhire like Google and Amazon

#46

Or maybe the current tech layoffs are a fad not driven by necessity, and Apple tends to set trends, not mindlessly follow them?

Most layoffs are happening in growth businesses that aren’t even profitable on paper. Apple, make things, things people want and quite often need. they are a solid business that are unlikely to suffer much in a short term tightening of people’s finances interest rate rises.

> Most layoffs are happening in growth businesses that aren’t even profitable on paper.

Google? Facebook? Microsoft? All very profitable, all doing layoffs.

Re: Apple avoids job cuts because it didn’t overhire like Google and Amazon

#47
post #33

> Apple, meanwhile, was more cautious. Its headcount increased just 20% from 2020 to 2022 At Apples size this is still pretty huge. At least, I thought it was until I saw that Amazon, Meta and Salesforce basically DOUBLED in 2 years. If this data is correct isnt that insane? How can you effectively double orgs of this size over a 2 year period? Its not like a startup with 50 people or something. I guess I was out of…

Correct on all counts. The hiring was insane and even with the cuts the number of employees is still higher than 2020

Re: Apple avoids job cuts because it didn’t overhire like Google and Amazon

#48

You mean to tell me that Apple could have created thousands of high paying jobs, if only for several years, but didn’t. And this is good? I can never remember who to be mad at. More seriously, I realize this is just clickbait, but I wonder how you could determine objectively which approach (hiring slow and needing to catch up, hiring medium, hiring fast and needing to fire) is “better for business”. Seems very hard t…

> You mean to tell me that Apple could have created thousands of high paying jobs, if only for several years, but didn’t. And this is good?

Yes, I consider it good management and judgement. Apple is a company, not some charity. Amazon, etc didn't hire out of the goodness of their hearts they felt they could capitalize on something that didn't materialize.

Re: Apple avoids job cuts because it didn’t overhire like Google and Amazon

#49
Given Apple’s headcount increased during same period was significantly less than comparable companies, one might take the position that they in sum contributed significantly less to labor market than similar tech companies.

For example, if Apple grew headcount by 20%, but laid off zero percent — percentage wise, they’re still significantly behind contributions made to labor market of a comparable company that double in size and then laid off 20% of its workforce; meaning not only did the comparable company increase the percentage of people being paid during the period, but also at the end of the period had increased the overall percentage of new employees.

Re: Apple avoids job cuts because it didn’t overhire like Google and Amazon

#50
post #22

Apple got burned bad the last time they were caught organizing a wage fixing cartel: https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-tech-jo... It's different this time around though, because economy. The tech layoffs started at the least profitable companies with the weakest balance sheets first (Google, Microsoft), and besides the whole economy is doing massive layoffs because of the recession and high interes…

Read “they” as “Steve Jobs personally”.
Post reply on HN