Live data from Hacker News

Flexport slashes 20% of global workforce over weak 2023 volume forecast

theloadstar.com

41–50 of 254 posts

Re: Flexport slashes 20% of global workforce over weak 2023 volume forecast

#41
post #40
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Where did you get the impression that two is fine? That part was a joke because of Flexport's layoffs due to lack of volume. The stacking is probably a separate topic compared to the success of his business, but was just stating why his name and company are familiar on HN. I personally believe they should stack them vertically vs horizontal stacking to save space so they are always accessible vs 2-3-4 high. (also a…

I still don't get the bit where you say 2 high is standard. It's not. Though US port infrastructure is special, it's very outdated/inefficient compared to pretty much the rest of the world.

It's from the article last time this came around [1] "For instance, Petersen says, local zoning rules prevented the owner of truck yards in Long Beach from storing containers more than two high"

[1] https://www.npr.org/2021/11/03/1051773672/a-look-at-whats-ca...

Re: Flexport slashes 20% of global workforce over weak 2023 volume forecast

#42
post #3

The original source seems to be posted at https://www.flexport.com/blog/flexport-co-ceos-note-to-emplo...

Interesting that they say: > At Flexport, 2023 is going to bring extraordinary velocity – we are in the process of doubling our software engineering talent and moving to single threaded business organizations to build world class products faster, and we will continue to invest in delivering best-in-class operational execution for our customers. Looks like they are laying off non-tech workers who they have made (or wi…

moving to single threaded business organizations

What does that even mean? They are only able to do one thing at a time? Doesn't sound like a recipe for business success to me...

Re: Flexport slashes 20% of global workforce over weak 2023 volume forecast

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting that they say: > At Flexport, 2023 is going to bring extraordinary velocity – we are in the process of doubling our software engineering talent and moving to single threaded business organizations to build world class products faster, and we will continue to invest in delivering best-in-class operational execution for our customers. Looks like they are laying off non-tech workers who they have made (or wi…

moving to single threaded business organizations What does that even mean? They are only able to do one thing at a time? Doesn't sound like a recipe for business success to me...

Probably removing redundancy in the business flow process path?

Re: Flexport slashes 20% of global workforce over weak 2023 volume forecast

#47
post #32
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"2 Gs", in the US at least, means "two thousand" (G as in Grand)

I wouldn't immediately parse that abbreviation in the US--but if I did I'd parse it as G being shorthand for grand. More commonly 2Gs would be used for 2x the normal force of gravity--i.e. you weigh twice as much.

> More commonly 2Gs would be used for 2x the normal force of gravity--i.e. you weigh twice as much.

That's a lower case g.

Re: Flexport slashes 20% of global workforce over weak 2023 volume forecast

#49
post #16
post #2

I don't know what Flexport is, all I know is that it was the only jobs ad in Hacker News for a long time

YC-funded freight forwarding company. Basic thesis is by using tech, you can dramatically lower the labor costs of forwarding, and since freight forwarding has huge returns to scale, the benefits compound. They raised 2 G$ from 2019-2022, and their CEO used that warchest to expand counter-cyclically through the pandemic. TBD if either of the two theses pan out. Freight forwarding itself is the industry of coordinatin…

Is there room for more innovation in the space, thoughts?

Re: Flexport slashes 20% of global workforce over weak 2023 volume forecast

#50
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wouldn't immediately parse that abbreviation in the US--but if I did I'd parse it as G being shorthand for grand. More commonly 2Gs would be used for 2x the normal force of gravity--i.e. you weigh twice as much.

> More commonly 2Gs would be used for 2x the normal force of gravity--i.e. you weigh twice as much. That's a lower case g.

As with many things I never expect others to be respecting arbitrary style guides when they write something. (Same reason I wouldn't use semi-weekly or biweekly.)
Post reply on HN