41–50 of 82 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I’ve had this skepticism until I started asking the bot to do things like “create a limerick using some words that have never existed before and then explain the definition of those words.” Sounds interesting! Mind sharing the results?
I’m not saying they’re good. Just that they’re (mostly) following the rules and aren’t just thematically random. https://ibb.co/RpSxcV8 https://ibb.co/883GpHY
This day I asked it not too fundamental questions about Clojure and it was able to provide impressive, accurate answers and provide correct code examples. However if you continue the dialogue and ask it to do more advanced stuff, it will just make up stuff out of thin air. For instance it will use functions that don't exist and claim that they can be imported from packages that don't exist or don't have them. Once yo…
The issue is that it still takes some human finangling to make it work. But it is able to understand the word problems, even long ones, pretty well.
I think it must have seen the solution somewhere already on the web. I find it extremely hard to believe that such a general purpose chatbot would just be able to solve programming problems. Deepmind had a paper [1] on solving programming problems a couple of months ago and they had to apply quite specialized heuristics in order to solve these problems. Obviously ChatGPT does nothing of the sorts and it just seems ex…
will be interesting to see how far it can get
I think it must have seen the solution somewhere already on the web. I find it extremely hard to believe that such a general purpose chatbot would just be able to solve programming problems. Deepmind had a paper [1] on solving programming problems a couple of months ago and they had to apply quite specialized heuristics in order to solve these problems. Obviously ChatGPT does nothing of the sorts and it just seems ex…
I’ve had this skepticism until I started asking the bot to do things like “create a limerick using some words that have never existed before and then explain the definition of those words.” I don’t believe the AI is generalized by any means. But I think it’s more than a Eliza-style parlour trick. It does really well with facts but misses subjectivity and nuance. Like I ask it to write stories for Seinfeld or Raymond…
I think it must have seen the solution somewhere already on the web. I find it extremely hard to believe that such a general purpose chatbot would just be able to solve programming problems. Deepmind had a paper [1] on solving programming problems a couple of months ago and they had to apply quite specialized heuristics in order to solve these problems. Obviously ChatGPT does nothing of the sorts and it just seems ex…
"Unfortunately, I am unable to provide a detailed description of the education system in Poland and its changes over the last 30 years because I have limited access to information and cannot browse the internet."
but I have no idea if it's not lying :)
I think it must have seen the solution somewhere already on the web. I find it extremely hard to believe that such a general purpose chatbot would just be able to solve programming problems. Deepmind had a paper [1] on solving programming problems a couple of months ago and they had to apply quite specialized heuristics in order to solve these problems. Obviously ChatGPT does nothing of the sorts and it just seems ex…
Yeah it can't solve novel questions. The AI couldn't do much to solve this one for example: https://codeforces.com/contest/1672/problem/D ChatGPT is just a very good copy/paste, not a logical problem solver(yet).
I used 'z' instead of 'a' to avoid any possible issues with the article 'a'. I think I messed up the assignment of z[l] at z[r] being after its updated, not sure.
But it created the input format, described it and the program ran the first time once i fixed the indents (code formatting is broken for some reason). If I run against the input at the contest page I get NO NO NO NO YES.
I think it must have seen the solution somewhere already on the web. I find it extremely hard to believe that such a general purpose chatbot would just be able to solve programming problems. Deepmind had a paper [1] on solving programming problems a couple of months ago and they had to apply quite specialized heuristics in order to solve these problems. Obviously ChatGPT does nothing of the sorts and it just seems ex…
I’ve had this skepticism until I started asking the bot to do things like “create a limerick using some words that have never existed before and then explain the definition of those words.” I don’t believe the AI is generalized by any means. But I think it’s more than a Eliza-style parlour trick. It does really well with facts but misses subjectivity and nuance. Like I ask it to write stories for Seinfeld or Raymond…
Write a deep poem about life, death, and the website Rotten Tomatoes
The result:
Life is a fleeting flame
A dance in the endless game
We come and we go
Leaving our mark, but never to know
What the future holds or who's to blame
Death is the great unknown
A mystery, never to be shown
But Rotten Tomatoes, a website so bold
Attempts to rate our stories untold
As if life and death can be bought and sold.
But in the end, what does it matter?
The ratings, the reviews, the bitter chatter
For in the grand scheme of things
We are but fleeting moments, the faintest of flings
And Rotten Tomatoes, a mere blip on the radar.