Live data from Hacker News

VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

virtualbox.org

41–50 of 176 posts

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#41
post #22

Oracle was responsible for my first complaint, while I was doing my first internship in the US. Because once I used my private laptop with the VirtualBox Extension Pack while connected to the work network. The incredible legal/licensing team got in touch because they identified this use. Since than I avoid Oracle like plague.

It's a shame that Oracle make their products toxic because this particular one is truly fantastic.

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#42

What value does vm encryption have? I’d rather encrypt my host and leave my vms unencrypted, given it would be possible to back door virtual box binaries given an unencrypted file system, or keylog keys assuming a remote breach.

Virtualbox VM encryption can be useful if the host hypervisor is compromised and the unauthorized party uploads data on disk that the host can trivially access (as is frequently the case with ransomware).

I don’t understand your comment at all. Ransomware can encrypt and encrypted virtual machine. If the host is compromised at a privilege level able to read or modify the VM, the vm is also implicitly compromised.

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#43
post #22

Oracle was responsible for my first complaint, while I was doing my first internship in the US. Because once I used my private laptop with the VirtualBox Extension Pack while connected to the work network. The incredible legal/licensing team got in touch because they identified this use. Since than I avoid Oracle like plague.

Oh yeah when I worked at Oracle they'd do these kinds of shakedowns even on stuff people were paying to host. This was pre OCI though, dunno if they're still doing it. Felt like something the mob would do.

Nice company you have there, shame if something were unlicensed eh?

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What’s wrong with qemu/kvm?

I find libvirtd to be fine other than sound when compared to virtualbox. I never did get sound to not be laggy and jerky in qemu on linux hosts.

For a Linux guest, I just forward the host's pulseaudio socket over ssh.

    ssh -R /run/user/1000/pulse/native:/run/user/1000/pulse/native -X the-vm the-audio-using-command
I use this VM for occasional video watching and for video conferencing and haven't had any audio problems.

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#47
post #28

> Audio recording: Now using Vorbis as the default audio format for WebM containers. Opus is no longer being used. I wonder why.

It cannot possibly be for technical reasons. It's almost certainly something to do with this: https://www.vectis.com/media/vectis-ip-announces-call-for-pa... Which is complete bullsh*t. Looks like Fraunhoffer and Dolby intend to go after any commercial product using Opus, and demand fees. They claim this is only for hardware devices … for now. As to software, they only state they do not intend to go after open source…

[deleted]

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#48

Has anyone had luck getting decent GUI performance (macOS host, Linux guest)? I don't need 3D, just sane 2D performance. The last time I tried this, it was so bad that I had to drastically decrease the window size to get reasonable performance. As in, it would basically lock up above a certain window size, and no reasonable amount of waiting would get it to respond. (And yes, I fiddled with all of the obvious knobs f…

GUI performance was never great, but neither was it that bad either. Certainly nothing like you've described. This is with Windows and Linux hosts, running Linux or BSD guests

Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration

#49

Has anyone had luck getting decent GUI performance (macOS host, Linux guest)? I don't need 3D, just sane 2D performance. The last time I tried this, it was so bad that I had to drastically decrease the window size to get reasonable performance. As in, it would basically lock up above a certain window size, and no reasonable amount of waiting would get it to respond. (And yes, I fiddled with all of the obvious knobs f…

Use VNC/RDP to connect to the guest.
Post reply on HN