Live data from Hacker News

Atkinson Hyperlegible Font

brailleinstitute.org

41–50 of 239 posts

Re: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font

#41
post #23
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure why it wouldn't open for you, but it opens fine in Chrome on Mac. I thought it would be some ridiculous 50 page legalese but it's actually only 1.5 pages long. it's basically a license similar to what you'd see on a Github repo.

But why PDF at all? Is there a reason to put the online license in a PDF? Or any other places, like the restaurant menus? is there anybody who wants/needs to print the license or the restaurant menu?

My guess? They use an agency to service their website and made the license in PDF so the org can change it without incurring additional cost of an update.

Re: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font

#42
post #2

Are there any monospaced fonts like this, with a focus on hyperlegibility?

I am a big fan of Berkeley Mono. It has (for me at least) this really hard to describe fusion of retro and modern that just feels perfect for coding and console to me. Note: Unfortunately not free, but I did manage to figure out how to make it a static definition as part of my NixOS declarative configuration, lol. https://berkeleygraphics.com/typefaces/berkeley-mono Note that I just noticed that you can easily add At…

Oh wow — I love Univers and Eurostile, makes Berkeley Mono a contender!

Re: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font

#43

Although the font did really try to nail its goal, I think Iosevka really nailed it. On top of that, somebody took some of what Atkinson did with their font, and applied it to Iosevka, using its insanely powerful ability to be customized wildly, to produce http://thedarnedestthing.com/iosevka%20hyperlegible

FWIW, the font on that blog post is not Iosevka, You can find Iosevka here -> https://typeof.net/Iosevka/

I find the 0.5em character width reduces readability somewhat. YMMV.

Re: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font

#44

Although the font did really try to nail its goal, I think Iosevka really nailed it. On top of that, somebody took some of what Atkinson did with their font, and applied it to Iosevka, using its insanely powerful ability to be customized wildly, to produce http://thedarnedestthing.com/iosevka%20hyperlegible

FWIW, the font on that blog post is not Iosevka, You can find Iosevka here -> https://typeof.net/Iosevka/

It is an Iosevka.

Re: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font

#45
An aside: Why is it that most posts about a new product or project some people have put together is usually greeted with skepticism and negativity in HN comments? What is that all about? It is a pattern Ive continuously seen and it seems like only the true home runs receive any kind of praise.

Most replies are either about lack of evidence or someone’s alternative preference. I see that latter one a good deal.

Re: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am a big fan of Berkeley Mono. It has (for me at least) this really hard to describe fusion of retro and modern that just feels perfect for coding and console to me. Note: Unfortunately not free, but I did manage to figure out how to make it a static definition as part of my NixOS declarative configuration, lol. https://berkeleygraphics.com/typefaces/berkeley-mono Note that I just noticed that you can easily add At…

Oh wow — I love Univers and Eurostile, makes Berkeley Mono a contender!

The other cool thing about it (not sure if this is common) is that you can customize your variety of the zero character and a few other characters that have debatable or preferential forms

Re: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font

#47

An aside: Why is it that most posts about a new product or project some people have put together is usually greeted with skepticism and negativity in HN comments? What is that all about? It is a pattern Ive continuously seen and it seems like only the true home runs receive any kind of praise. Most replies are either about lack of evidence or someone’s alternative preference. I see that latter one a good deal.

probably the same reason new JS frameworks get a lot of criticism. adding another one expands an already daunting array of choices to make, most often without a clear benefit, as seems to be the case here.

Re: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font

#48

An aside: Why is it that most posts about a new product or project some people have put together is usually greeted with skepticism and negativity in HN comments? What is that all about? It is a pattern Ive continuously seen and it seems like only the true home runs receive any kind of praise. Most replies are either about lack of evidence or someone’s alternative preference. I see that latter one a good deal.

Because you are the easiest person to lie to, yourself. Just because you work in a field doesn't mean your assumptions are valid. The more people (or you yourself) consider you an expert in something, the more you should test your assumptions through studies etc. If you don't, then claiming you made a thing "for X" without any proof that X benefits from that means you've almost certainly lied to yourself, convinced yourself that lie was true, and are now perpetuating that lie by putting it on the internet. Especially when you do things based on your own experience, it's incredibly easy to forget that there are almost infinitely more people who are different and have different needs and experiences.

And of course, your things can be just fine, but without proof of that, claiming that they are just tells people you have no idea whether what you did was actually worth anything, and that undermines your effort.

The thing you made MIGHT actually be great! But it might also only be great for a super select few hyper-focussed people that you happened to ask for help (or not even, you might have purely relied on "your own past experiences"!), and be terrible in general.

Make tiny claims centered around tiny groups (e.g. "I/my customers needed something better so I made this"), not a problem. Make big claims involving "everyone" (e.g. "we made a typeface that improves legibility")? Back them up with proof. Show the studies where you've pitched it against a wide set of other typefaces, and have people of all visual impairment levels perform (also scientificially justified for this purpose) tasks that hinge on legibility.

(Because winning awards may be nice, but doesn't tell us anything. It just says "other people already liked this". It doesn't say anything about whether the thing you made is actually good)

Re: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font

#49

An aside: Why is it that most posts about a new product or project some people have put together is usually greeted with skepticism and negativity in HN comments? What is that all about? It is a pattern Ive continuously seen and it seems like only the true home runs receive any kind of praise. Most replies are either about lack of evidence or someone’s alternative preference. I see that latter one a good deal.

>Why is it that most posts about a new product or project some people have put together is usually greeted with skepticism and negativity

Because most posts about a new product or project tend to make extravagant claims without anything to back it up. "The best", "the fastest", "the smallest", "the most legible", etc.

Re: Atkinson Hyperlegible Font

#50

I like this idea, but when I go to the web page... > Download the Font… and change the world! By downloading, installing and/or using the font software, you confirm that you have read and agree to be bound by the terms of this End-User License Agreement... Sigh. I guess I need to read that EULA. Anyway, clicking on that then downloads a pdf rather than a nice link to some web page text. Sigh. So then anyway, trying t…

> Why must everything in the world be so hard?

linux user?

Post reply on HN