I'm a long time Plex user, and I have not received this email. Not sure if I should be worried or if the breach has just affected a subset of users. I use random unique passwords for everything anyway, as long as no credit card details were taken it shouldn't be a big deal hopefully. I was able to log into the site now and no message was displayed at all. Edit: Not sure why I would be getting down-voted for this. Sec…
Plex: Important notice of a potential data breach
41–50 of 194 posts
Re: Plex: Important notice of a potential data breach
#42Re: Plex: Important notice of a potential data breach
#43question: why use Plex over Kodi?
Re: Plex: Important notice of a potential data breach
#44Re: Plex: Important notice of a potential data breach
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference between email and password is you can validate a password with a hash, but you can’t send an email to a hashed address. Their db may be encrypted at rest, but a hacker could still compromise a system that has the key in memory.
Encrypt the email in column, add hashed email in separated column. Email Sending would then be covered by a separated and "airgapped" system that holds the decryption key, if you need to send mail, you send the encrypted email address plus what you want to send there. Now an attacker cannot get a hold of email addresses easily.
Re: Plex: Important notice of a potential data breach
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Encrypt the email in column, add hashed email in separated column. Email Sending would then be covered by a separated and "airgapped" system that holds the decryption key, if you need to send mail, you send the encrypted email address plus what you want to send there. Now an attacker cannot get a hold of email addresses easily.
How would you tell the airgapped system what to send?
Re: Plex: Important notice of a potential data breach
#47A delete account option would be nice in this case. I'd rather just have my data deleted even if it has already been compromised just to tie off this loose end.
Re: Plex: Important notice of a potential data breach
#48If true, then this will probably reignite discussions around Plex requiring that you authenticate with their servers when using the service to view content that you're hosting on your own hardware. If anyone is curious, then alternatives like Jellyfin exist. It's a bit different and may not have all the features you need, but it works quite well in my experience.
But otherwise I've switched to Infuse[2] since then, it indexes sources reliably on its own (no manual editing though) and saves the entire need for a server if you use it with some cloud storage. Basically replaced my Plex server, with the added bonus of out-of-home streaming without needing high upload. The major disadvantage is that it's Apple-only.
1: https://support.plex.tv/articles/207538527-do-i-need-a-plex-... 2: https://firecore.com/infuse
Re: Plex: Important notice of a potential data breach
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the healthcare industry in USA, Personal Identification Information (PII)/Personal Health Information (PHI) needs to be encrypted at rest and in transit and is mandated by law. So, they are required to encrypt PII/PHI data fields. Some of those practices may be generally applied for non-healthcare settings as well.
To get nitpicky... (usual disclaimer, IANAL but I worked in health IT including heavy involvement in HIPAA topics earlier in my career) I don't think there's a requirement under HIPAA or HITECH to use encryption. The relevant parts of HIPAA are the duty to not disclose PHI to unauthorized recipients and breach notification requirements if you do incorrectly disclose PHI (the HIPAA breach notification rule). The magic…
From the HHS site: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/faq/2001/is-the-...
> Is the use of encryption mandatory in the Security Rule?
> Answer:
> No. The final Security Rule made the use of encryption an addressable implementation specification. See 45 CFR § 164.312(a)(2)(iv) and (e)(2)(ii). The encryption implementation specification is addressable, and must therefore be implemented if, after a risk assessment, the entity has determined that the specification is a reasonable and appropriate safeguard in its risk management of the confidentiality, integrity and availability of e-PHI. If the entity decides that the addressable implementation specification is not reasonable and appropriate, it must document that determination and implement an equivalent alternative measure, presuming that the alternative is reasonable and appropriate. If the standard can otherwise be met, the covered entity may choose to not implement the implementation specification or any equivalent alternative measure and document the rationale for this decision.
Re: Plex: Important notice of a potential data breach
#50http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=192.254.122....