Live data from Hacker News

Scots research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out

sundaypost.com

41–49 of 49 posts

Re: Scots research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here's one from 2022: https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/gallery/individual.php?db_date=2...

A tiny bloom in Bristol Channel doesn't contradict the findings of the scientists.

I didn't say it did, but if you can see blooms from space still, that suggests that they are not "all but gone." They may be significantly reduced, but nowhere near "gone."

If the scientists had made falsifiable predictions about WHEN they expected the population to drop, or the RATE of decline, then we would have something to discuss scientifically.

Instead we get extreme rhetoric that is likely an exageration, that helps convince noone.

Re: Scots research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A tiny bloom in Bristol Channel doesn't contradict the findings of the scientists.

I didn't say it did, but if you can see blooms from space still, that suggests that they are not "all but gone." They may be significantly reduced, but nowhere near "gone." If the scientists had made falsifiable predictions about WHEN they expected the population to drop, or the RATE of decline, then we would have something to discuss scientifically. Instead we get extreme rhetoric that is likely an exageration, that…

I think you're underestimating the size of the Atlantic Ocean. Both things can be happening at the same time.

> If the scientists had made falsifiable predictions about WHEN they expected the population to drop, or the RATE of decline, then we would have something to discuss scientifically.

On this we agree.

> Instead we get extreme rhetoric that is likely an exageration, that helps convince noone.

That statement is an example of itself. Well met.

Re: Scots research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You know that image was from 2002 right?

Here's one from 2022: https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/gallery/individual.php?db_date=2...

But it’s not - that was a global map, this is a local selection of an extreme event. Even if the papers thesis is correct, that average plankton counts are collapsing, there’s no reason to believe you won’t continue to see variances and even extremes.

The writing and language used aside they’ve found something worth trying to verify. They collected a bunch of samples from a lot of places and expected to find a lot more life than they did. This is concerning because it could mean some dire situation reflecting on the health of the entire earth. Seems like reasonable research that spurs further research, but I think if their observations are consistent with future research this would be a pretty serious situation.

Re: Scots research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is nothing we as individuals can do about it. Global industry pollution should have been internationally controlled decades ago if we would have had any chance of ducking this. Many has screamed about this for years, recently Greta. 2 years of covid pandemic gave the earth some breathing-room but seems in hindsight only to have slowed down the end date by about 6 months, according to recent graphs. The decision…

Now we are fucked? Now? The people scolding the masses for using plastic bags at the grocery store are still riding in private jets. For media events and fancy dinners. Jaunting around the world in planes fueled by dinosaur juice, financed by human suffering. But this is nothing new. Dinosaur juice just means that no humans are having to row inside the plane. That and physics, but if it weren’t for the physics, Amazo…

Just out of interest, is the systemic issue you mention laisse faire capitalism?

Re: Scots research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now we are fucked? Now? The people scolding the masses for using plastic bags at the grocery store are still riding in private jets. For media events and fancy dinners. Jaunting around the world in planes fueled by dinosaur juice, financed by human suffering. But this is nothing new. Dinosaur juice just means that no humans are having to row inside the plane. That and physics, but if it weren’t for the physics, Amazo…

Just out of interest, is the systemic issue you mention laisse faire capitalism?

No. Significantly older. If there is a name I do not know it.

Re: Scots research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just out of interest, is the systemic issue you mention laisse faire capitalism?

No. Significantly older. If there is a name I do not know it.

Can you describe it?

Re: Scots research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. Significantly older. If there is a name I do not know it.

Can you describe it?

The seeming inevitability of power dichotomies and the abuse that tends to follow.

Different levels of power is unavoidable. It is part of existence. Those differences may balance out when dealing with two individuals, or groups, but typically there is a more powerful and a less powerful.

And typically the more powerful group takes advantage of the situation. That’s long been advantageous but the advantage has also long become a hindrance on real progress. A parasitic replacement for it.

It doesn’t take humans for this to arise, but humans have spent millennia institutionalizing it in numerous forms.

“How to stop being animals” is too flippant, and not terribly accurate.

Regardless, our society and history is so permeated with this concept / construct, and with attempts to enshrine it as unshakeable truth of being, that “doing something different” is incredibly difficult. For many reasons.

It is so pervasive that it is borderline… fractal? The power structures showing institutionalized abuse are parts of power structures that… abuse of power differences all the way down.

More angles for explaining why than you can shake a stick at. Not a lot of broad “why not,” it is usually focused on some localized example.

That’s an attempt at describing it.

Re: Scots research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you describe it?

The seeming inevitability of power dichotomies and the abuse that tends to follow. Different levels of power is unavoidable. It is part of existence. Those differences may balance out when dealing with two individuals, or groups, but typically there is a more powerful and a less powerful. And typically the more powerful group takes advantage of the situation. That’s long been advantageous but the advantage has also l…

Thanks for the description. Sounds like you mean power hierarchies, which as you say are inevitable.

From that point of view the best 'solution' would be to spread power as wide as possible. I think in reality the reason power hierarchies are useful is because spreading power too wide leads to Ochlocracy.

In the same way democracy is good or bad depending on the level of rationality, morality in your population; but for modern society I would say it's mostly bad (e.g. if you let the average man on the street 'solve' climate change he would lay the foundation for a dystopia)

Re: Scots research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out

#49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The seeming inevitability of power dichotomies and the abuse that tends to follow. Different levels of power is unavoidable. It is part of existence. Those differences may balance out when dealing with two individuals, or groups, but typically there is a more powerful and a less powerful. And typically the more powerful group takes advantage of the situation. That’s long been advantageous but the advantage has also l…

Thanks for the description. Sounds like you mean power hierarchies, which as you say are inevitable. From that point of view the best 'solution' would be to spread power as wide as possible. I think in reality the reason power hierarchies are useful is because spreading power too wide leads to Ochlocracy. In the same way democracy is good or bad depending on the level of rationality, morality in your population; but…

“From that point of view the best 'solution' would be to spread power as wide as possible”

Not necessarily. Because how? And to your point, because on that I think we agree, what would a well intentioned individual do with no guardrails, let alone one with bad intent?

I am under no delusion that the solution would be to simply spread out power. For one, my simple mind can’t imagine how that would actually work, without getting corrupted, in current year.

No, I’m more concerned about how humanity can form any sort of societal structure, power structure, without having one of those two above people (meaning all of us, at times) royally fuck it up.

But that’s what thousands of years of human history seem to indicate. We are doing something wrong as a species, if not at least something horribly inefficient, vulnerable to abuse, and likely to cause harm.

I’m not looking for an answer, I certainly don’t have one. I still don’t fully understand the problem. But it seems lower level than the distribution of power. I’d almost say more primal, or animal, but that feels like it cheapens it.

Post reply on HN