Live data from Hacker News

700M users and Premium

telegram.org

41–50 of 330 posts

Re: 700M users and Premium

#41
post #10

So who here is using Telegram and for what? I'm consider myself pretty well connected, but I don't have the app. Tell me what I'm missing.

I use it for notification from many servers... just a quick curl in a script, and I get an alert on my phone in a matter of milliseconds.

That's actually awesome, does Telegram have an API of some sort?

Re: 700M users and Premium

#43
post #10

So who here is using Telegram and for what? I'm consider myself pretty well connected, but I don't have the app. Tell me what I'm missing.

Telegram is my main messenger to speak to friends and family. I also use it to connect to the chatrooms of the various open source projects I participate in.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#44
post #6

Has telegram addressed these concerns? https://twitter.com/moxie/status/1474067549574688768

Astounded by some of the negative comments there. (Probably partly Twitter pushing the rage bait to the top, but still). Does Telegram just have a stupid fanbase?

- people claiming MTProto (Telegram's custom protocol which is basically a worse TLS) makes it in any way more secure than pretty much any other system

- people saying moxie is just pushing MobileCoin. Maybe, I don't know, but what does that have to do with Signal? And even if Signal is a total scam, how does that make Telegram not terrible?

- people saying Signal is backdoored by . We don't know if that's even possible. If it is, then probably so are almost all other e2e encrypted chat apps. And it's about 100x more plausible that Telegram is backdoored - it certainly could be.

The only slightly valid criticism I saw there is that you have to use your actual phone number with Signal. But that doesn't make Telegram any good.

I'd take Telegram over SMS, but I'd almost take SMS+rot13 over Telegram.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#45
post #25
post #6

Has telegram addressed these concerns? https://twitter.com/moxie/status/1474067549574688768

There's nothing to address. Telegram chats are encrypted to and from the server, they're not E2E encrypted, they do not claim to be by default. They do offer E2E chats you can opt into, and there has not been a single example of an E2E message being cracked.

The telegram web page claims on the first page:

> Telegram messages are heavily encrypted and can self-destruct.

How is Joe Average supposed to understand that?

Adding to that, the secret chat encryption has always been Weird (capital W) and in one of the previous generations the server could actually MITM it. Trivially.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#46

Telegram has a very interesting development history. They were nomadic for the early 2010's, eventually landing in Dubai. Apparently this was because they feared being pressured by governments (the CEO and founders are Russian). Is Dubai a place with good protection against government pressure?

> Is Dubai a place with good protection against government pressure? Depends on the government :) The German government has been throwing a temper tantrum and threatening to bad Telegram because Telegram doesn't respond to data requests from German police and spies.

So they don't give it to Germany, that's good. Do they give it to Dubai's government?

Re: 700M users and Premium

#47
post #10

So who here is using Telegram and for what? I'm consider myself pretty well connected, but I don't have the app. Tell me what I'm missing.

Quoted post unavailable.

Censorsip is censorship whether we like the censored or not. Anti lockdown, and anti vax were (mostly illegally) censored, cancelled, stigmatised by governments and other public institutions, is that not good to have tech available that guarantees privacy? Whether those who wish anonymity and privacy are truely actively censored is irrelevant.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#48
post #10

So who here is using Telegram and for what? I'm consider myself pretty well connected, but I don't have the app. Tell me what I'm missing.

I'm using it to communicate with family members and to follow some development-related channels. Why Telegram?

- Telegram vs. Whatsapp is clear, Whatsapp is off-limits due to it being owned by Zuckerberg & Co.

- Telegram vs. Signal is a bit less clear but the user experience offered by Telegram is superior to that of Signal which made it easy to get some of my more computer-averse family members to accept it. The fact that Telegram is easy to use across devices - native apps on mobile and PC, web, CLI, you name it - is a big plus here.

- Telegram vs. XMPP is a battle which has yet to be fought, I have an XMPP server standing by for the moment when Telegram crosses some line which makes me want to switch. With Conversations on Android the user experience is quite good so I consider this to be a serious contender.

- Telegram vs. XXX - see Telegram vs. Signal.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#49

Telegram blows my mind. Say what you want about their security; they have the absolute best UX of any (primarily 1-on-1) messaging app, bar none. Discord is a close second. But the quality and polish of telegram blows me away to this day. And it’s lots of small features and details such as built in translation for messages in a foreign language, all the smooth animations, quick look and summaries of channels with agg…

Of course. Telegram seems to be the clear winner here at convincing the masses to move off of WhatsApp and have them stick around in Telegram. 700M tells us that it is a viable alternative for many users.

Signal on the other hand seems to have failed to stick with the rest of the users and instead of trying to attract users from WhatsApp, not only they can't get backing up messages working properly, they instead were focused on introducing a scam cryptocurrency and wallet only usable on their app that no-one wants, and probably scared everyone off.

Perhaps Signal is only good for getting users to keep using WhatsApp or Telegram, since there are too many missing basic features that the end users keep complaining about when trying it out.

Re: 700M users and Premium

#50

Telegram has a very interesting development history. They were nomadic for the early 2010's, eventually landing in Dubai. Apparently this was because they feared being pressured by governments (the CEO and founders are Russian). Is Dubai a place with good protection against government pressure?

> Is Dubai a place with good protection against government pressure? Depends on the government :) The German government has been throwing a temper tantrum and threatening to bad Telegram because Telegram doesn't respond to data requests from German police and spies.

>The German government has been throwing a temper tantrum

that 'temper tantrum' is colloquially known as the rule of law, and Telegram has cooperated with the government concerning terrorism and child abuse as they should, or alternatively leave if they consider those rules unacceptable.

https://www.digitalinformationworld.com/2022/06/telegram-has...

Post reply on HN