Live data from Hacker News

House Address “Twins” Proximity (2017)

paulplowman.com

41–42 of 42 posts

Re: House Address “Twins” Proximity (2017)

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The last map seems to show several houses on that street with same numbers, because it looks like on the west side of that border the numbers go up to 443 from west to east, and on the east side of it, the numbers go up towards 443 from east to west. It's weirder than that. On the odd side, Bolton counts up to 443 and then, as you cross into Manchester, Manchester counts down from 443. But at least the progression…

As a general rule, even numbers are on one side of the street and odd numbers on the other. Some more details here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_numbering

Yes, I'm asking why 443 in Bolton is across from 538 rather than 442. It is not a general rule that the sequence of even numbers is completely unrelated to the facing sequence of odd numbers. They're supposed to be equivalent.

Re: House Address “Twins” Proximity (2017)

#42
post #6

I grew up in a 149 High Street. About 300m away was another 149 High Street. They both originally belonged to different villages but London's growth had filled in the gaps between the villages. We knew who lived there as it wasn't too infrequent that their post arrived at ours or vice versa.

Weird, the post code should have been different.

Postal system is not perfect. Post code databases are not perfect. The post codes were (and are) different, but post would get mixed up.

Same postie too! He'd typically correct it based on surname but occasionally something would get it through (and this was 30 years ago).

Post reply on HN