This author really does not want to confront some plain truths about his students and academia as it exists today.
> My understanding is that students who collect multiple faculty action reports like baseball cards may cease to be continuing students at my institution.
I suspect the institution doesn't give a good goddamn as long as the students wounds are self-inflected and their checks still clear.
> Even the student who sent 15 emails of lies got a second chance.
In a strange way, this article is really a character study about the author, and not at all about cheating. The author is deeply interested in procedure and drama, which makes for amusing storytelling, like a detective that's trying to find a murderer while constantly trying to convince himself that whoever he was, he didn't really mean it.
It is interesting how often he is attempting to detect cheating and plagiarism, even writing his own R scripts, and then says
> TBH, I’m so over trying to deter my students from cheating. There are so many ways I could lock down my courses. Not interested. If real life was about being monitored by proctoring software that spies on you at home and forces you to test under duress, it would be a sad real life.
But then continues attempting plagiarism detection for the rest of the semester, and the next! Maybe he considers it separate from cheating. Slightly baffled by all his behavior. He is quite kind, and expending extraordinary effort over students who are adamant about expending none at all.