Based on the quote above boilerplates are for people who are more founder-y than dev-y. Some see codebase as solution, some see code as solution.
Forge – A Django SaaS Framework
41–50 of 65 posts
Re: Forge – A Django SaaS Framework
#42$1000/yr is steep for starting a project from scratch with it. You need to really be sure about needing it and about it paying for itself. The Rails equivalent ( https://jumpstartrails.com/ ) is $249/year and the Laravel equivalent ( https://spark.laravel.com/ ) is $99/project. Those seem geared in features and price at hobbyist wanting to monetize a side project. This looks like it would be just as helpful for hobby…
> Maybe it’s more for people who are about to start a second revenue project.
I do think this is an interesting point that's come up a couple times now.
For what it's worth, I just added a 50% discount to the top of the page for the time being.
Re: Forge – A Django SaaS Framework
#43Re: Forge – A Django SaaS Framework
#44Unfortunate naming conflict with Laravel Forge
Re: Forge – A Django SaaS Framework
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Like others I also wonder who's the intended audience. Me too — trying to figure that out! > but that project needs to be basically non existent while also being somewhat serious Super interesting point. I've helped integrate it into some existing projects and it is not fun. > In what way is it more than an expensive cookiecutter repository? I don't disagree with this. A couple differences in my mind are support (t…
tailwind ui had a Goldilocks pricing imho .. you could always offer discounts case by case if prospect can fill out a form.
Re: Forge – A Django SaaS Framework
#46Add a Wagtail CMS layer and you'll have a number of agencies / companies potentially ready to use this as a service. Do you plan on providing a hosted version as well, or just the core shipped package?
Re: Forge – A Django SaaS Framework
#47I think this makes sense. Ideas: - Showcase your reciprocal contributions you make back to django community packages (e.g. Jazzband packages). - Release a permissively licensed django package (with no catches) under your GH's org and brand name and have it take off. (e.g. django-forge-admin) - The holy grail would be contributions to django itself. Example: Adding more CSS variables in django admin to font-size and f…
On the 1 customer vs 100, I totally lean towards the 100. I have a blend of these with https://www.pullapprove.com/ and the higher the price, the more it feels like you just work for them. Pros and cons, but personally I don't want something that looks like freelance/consulting/employment.
Re: Forge – A Django SaaS Framework
#48I'm interested and have purchased SaaSPegasus.com before. I like to compare the base setups between Django SaaS deployments for learnings. But SaaSPegasus is $299, imo $1,000 is far too much, and I wouldn't purchase it.
Thanks for the support and let me know if you have any suggestions on how to make Pegasus better! :)
Honestly I feel a little weird "competing" directly with something like this, but such is life. Thanks to everyone who has made something similar (in any ecosystem), which is part of what got me over the hump of thinking it was even possible. I'm glad Django is getting some options and new ideas!
Re: Forge – A Django SaaS Framework
#49I think this makes sense. Ideas: - Showcase your reciprocal contributions you make back to django community packages (e.g. Jazzband packages). - Release a permissively licensed django package (with no catches) under your GH's org and brand name and have it take off. (e.g. django-forge-admin) - The holy grail would be contributions to django itself. Example: Adding more CSS variables in django admin to font-size and f…
For example, imagine there are a bunch of startups trying their hardest to shoe-horn contributions in Django main branch. It puts a lot of load on core developers at Django to reject frivolous features and unnecessary bloat.
The end effect would be that we get features no one asks for and Django becomes even more bloated.
Django is already a very popular framework and has many contributors.
Re: Forge – A Django SaaS Framework
#50$1000/yr is steep for starting a project from scratch with it. You need to really be sure about needing it and about it paying for itself. The Rails equivalent ( https://jumpstartrails.com/ ) is $249/year and the Laravel equivalent ( https://spark.laravel.com/ ) is $99/project. Those seem geared in features and price at hobbyist wanting to monetize a side project. This looks like it would be just as helpful for hobby…
For Django there is also SaaS Pegasus( https://www.saaspegasus.com/ ) which has a pricing structure more in-line with Jumpstart Rails.