Live data from Hacker News

Meta Unveils New AI Supercomputer

wsj.com

41–50 of 199 posts

Re: Meta Unveils New AI Supercomputer

#41
post #5

“The experiences we’re building for the metaverse require enormous compute power…and RSC will enable new AI models that can learn from trillions of examples, understand hundreds of languages, and more,” Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg I don't really understand how AI processing is going to make the 'experiences' any better? This seems to me like investor fluff, saying they have some insane capability that other 'VR provider…

I'm hardly an advocate for any of Facebook/Meta's actions over the past... however long, but a lot of people forget that "Metaverse" doesn't just mean "virtual reality". VR could be a large component here, but the biggest goal of the Metaverse is really to map physical things into a digital world. That data can be used in any number of ways, not just VR/AR; it could be used to provide 3D models for common shopping goods in the Walmart app, give meteorologists an interactive forecast maps, map GitHub repositories to technology that you use every day... the list goes on. The real goal is ripping digital metadata from real-world objects, which could indeed be inferenced like an AI model for any number of uses.

Re: Meta Unveils New AI Supercomputer

#42
post #11

Anybody else get the sense that we're just totally frickin doomed? Even if Yudkowsky is off about AGI (which is a big maybe!) in what possible world will this technology be used to make our individual lives better (assuming you're not a FAIR researcher?)

Yes, I think we're in trouble. Walked over to friends' house over the weekend. It was a very nice, sunny weekend. Saw them through the window with their goggles on, rang the doorbell. They came to the door and I said, look how nice and sunny it it, we should go for a walk and they were like "oh, we had no idea it was so nice out because we were in Meta with our goggles on".

Re: Meta Unveils New AI Supercomputer

#43
> Meta’s AI supercomputer houses 6,080 Nvidia graphics-processing units ..... By mid-summer, when the AI Research SuperCluster is fully built, it will house some 16,000 GPUs

Honestly ... this is lot of GPUs ... but is it the biggest...?

> Model training is done with mixed precision on the NVIDIA DGX SuperPOD-based Selene supercomputer powered by 560 DGX A100 servers networked with HDR InfiniBand in a full fat tree configuration. Each DGX A100 has eight NVIDIA A100 80GB Tensor Core GPUs

So Nvidia used 4480 GPUs to train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B for example.

Re: Meta Unveils New AI Supercomputer

#44
post #5

“The experiences we’re building for the metaverse require enormous compute power…and RSC will enable new AI models that can learn from trillions of examples, understand hundreds of languages, and more,” Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg I don't really understand how AI processing is going to make the 'experiences' any better? This seems to me like investor fluff, saying they have some insane capability that other 'VR provider…

Consider reading https://ai.facebook.com/blog/ai-rsc

Re: Meta Unveils New AI Supercomputer

#45

What is the difference between “a supercomputer” and “a bunch of racks of computers”? The actual difference between the two is quite diminished compared to years past and seems to reduce more to how a collection of computers is used and not what it is.

> What is the difference between “a supercomputer” and “a bunch of racks of computers”?

In addition to the other responses, I like pointing people to this talk[1] by Jeff Hammond for a comprehensive answer to this question (you can skip to the 11:15 timestamp).

[1] https://uchicago.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Embed.aspx...

Re: Meta Unveils New AI Supercomputer

#46
post #26
post #5

“The experiences we’re building for the metaverse require enormous compute power…and RSC will enable new AI models that can learn from trillions of examples, understand hundreds of languages, and more,” Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg I don't really understand how AI processing is going to make the 'experiences' any better? This seems to me like investor fluff, saying they have some insane capability that other 'VR provider…

ît is not about making experiences better, it's about modeling behavior as to sell stuff

Those models are surprisingly tractable. You're nowhere near as interesting and unique as you might think you are at scale.

Evidence: actual work experience at building latent representations to characterize customer behavior at FAANG. It's hard to come up with something that really gets you, but it's not hard to come up with something likely to make you spend more. You're surprisingly predictable on that axis and even if you aren't because you put the hours into being a crazy outlier, almost everyone else is, and you don't matter.

Re: Meta Unveils New AI Supercomputer

#47
post #5

“The experiences we’re building for the metaverse require enormous compute power…and RSC will enable new AI models that can learn from trillions of examples, understand hundreds of languages, and more,” Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg I don't really understand how AI processing is going to make the 'experiences' any better? This seems to me like investor fluff, saying they have some insane capability that other 'VR provider…

Example 1: GPT-3 is a decent chatbot. Training a similar model so you can have a conversation with AIs in the "metaverse" (god, that word is terrible) could be fun / useful. Example 2: Using AI upscaling (like Nvidia) to improve visual fidelity in games. Example 3: Hand/body tracking for avatars. The more AI compute, the more experimentation researchers can do.

I guess "AI in the metaverse" sounds a lot better than "machine learning in Meta Inc's new VR platform".

Re: Meta Unveils New AI Supercomputer

#48
post #11

Anybody else get the sense that we're just totally frickin doomed? Even if Yudkowsky is off about AGI (which is a big maybe!) in what possible world will this technology be used to make our individual lives better (assuming you're not a FAIR researcher?)

We're not all doomed, just the NPC's who embrace it.

Re: Meta Unveils New AI Supercomputer

#49
post #11

Anybody else get the sense that we're just totally frickin doomed? Even if Yudkowsky is off about AGI (which is a big maybe!) in what possible world will this technology be used to make our individual lives better (assuming you're not a FAIR researcher?)

Have you ever heard of AlphaFold?

[0]: https://deepmind.com/blog/article/alphafold-a-solution-to-a-...

Re: Meta Unveils New AI Supercomputer

#50
post #11

Anybody else get the sense that we're just totally frickin doomed? Even if Yudkowsky is off about AGI (which is a big maybe!) in what possible world will this technology be used to make our individual lives better (assuming you're not a FAIR researcher?)

Yes, I think we're in trouble. Walked over to friends' house over the weekend. It was a very nice, sunny weekend. Saw them through the window with their goggles on, rang the doorbell. They came to the door and I said, look how nice and sunny it it, we should go for a walk and they were like "oh, we had no idea it was so nice out because we were in Meta with our goggles on".

I don't see how this is a bad thing. What's wrong with preferring the metaverse to their sunny neighborhood? Honestly the matrix seems like the end game here and I'm all for it. Then it can be a sunny day in the neighborhood every day. The doom comes from the matrix being built by people who either don't have our best interests in mind, or aren't competent enough to build the system to correctly act in our best interests.
Post reply on HN