Quoted post unavailable.
Quack medicine (which you'll find in just about every country) tends to have a much smaller harm radius.
41–50 of 101 posts
Quoted post unavailable.
Quack medicine (which you'll find in just about every country) tends to have a much smaller harm radius.
So what is right wing discourse in India? How would I distinguish it? Not to be disrespectful, I just would like to know since I have such a large number of Indian friends.
Quoted post unavailable.
Pretty sure the government tried paying people to install toilets in their homes but most refused and all continue to go in the streets as well - the occasional concerned citizen has even been assaulted for requesting that people not do it.
https://img.etimg.com/photo/msid-65207066,quality-100/graph....
[flagged]
So allow open lies and open hate?
[flagged]
Quoted post unavailable.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So allow open lies and open hate?
Of course! Just a few years ago people called that "free speech". Now the enemies of free speech are trying to win the terminology war by convincing people that stopping "hate" and "lies" is more important than protecting the concept of open and free exchange of ideas.
I'd like to understand why so many young people find extremist content so persuasive and engaging. I can't stand it, and I instantly close any website that allows for extreme content.
You may be in groups (or hold opinions) that others out there consider extremist, but to you feel very natural in the circles you associate with.
I think the far more worrying trend is trying to silence anyone with different political ideologies. Like their handpicked example of a user discussing "'destroý' Islam". Note, they added the quotes around destroy. But the actual content is reasonably thoughtful discussion of appointed supreme court judges and only claims "to end radical islam".
It’s interesting because “destroy whiteness” was and is a popular talking point in certain circles or the left. Obviously they don’t literally mean destroy white people but as always the benefit of the doubt is extended to them but “destroy Islam” immediately is interpreted as inherently violent or evil.
Let's see where you end up.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So allow open lies and open hate?
As much as I don’t like it, I think this is the best idea. This way ideas can be discussed and debated and light can be shed in areas otherwise hidden.