First thing I clicked on was C minor... which showed me "C minor scale". Problem is.. Is that a thing? I've not heard of "the C minor scale". I don't think it's a thing. (Jazz pianist here) In classical piano as a kid I was taught 2 minor scales - melodic (different going up to coming down) and harmonic. Your "minor scale" corresponds to the melodic minor descending, aka Aeolian mode. (i.e. white piano notes from A u…
This is a topic that I think is covered poorly sometimes. It's one of those things that is actually a much longer discussion. Think of it, in increasing complexity, 1. There is a major scale and a minor scale. 2. Actually, there are three minor scales: natural, melodic, and harmonic. 3. Actually, forget about those scales. Think instead more freely about tonality, modal mixtures, secondary dominants, and voice leadin…
Interactive piano reference to major and minor scales
41–50 of 94 posts
Re: Interactive piano reference to major and minor scales
#42The black keys are in the wrong place! The black keys within a group are supposed to be spaced farther apart, and there should be less space between groups. For example, C# and D#, in the diagram, are too close to each other. C# should be farther left, and D# should be farther right.
Hmm I don't agree. That spacing looks right to me, but, now you mention it, the E,F,B and C notes look quite a bit too wide, I think that's the problem.
Re: Interactive piano reference to major and minor scales
#43The black keys are in the wrong place! The black keys within a group are supposed to be spaced farther apart, and there should be less space between groups. For example, C# and D#, in the diagram, are too close to each other. C# should be farther left, and D# should be farther right.
Hmm I don't agree. That spacing looks right to me, but, now you mention it, the E,F,B and C notes look quite a bit too wide, I think that's the problem.
Re: Interactive piano reference to major and minor scales
#44I think this makes a simple topic needlessly complex. Only the mnemonic "Father Charles Goes Down And Ends Battle" might be worth memorizing, and the rest follows easily. Even that can be replaced by "just go up by fifths starting with F".
>and the rest follows easily. For you maybe. None of music theory makes even a smidgen of sense to me. Absolutely none of it. FTA: >First, a reference chart of the major scales, with keys in order of 5ths, as with the circle of fifths. This illustrates that there's just one note difference (at the 7th scale degree) between scales formed from keys that are separated by a fifth. Uh.. nothing about the circle of fifths…
Work it out on music paper, keeping in mind the pattern of whole- and half-steps that defines the diatonic scale. You'll see that it works out. It's not directly illustrated by the circle of fifths, as I point out in a sibling comment. But it works.
The musically-relevant consequence is that you can transpose stuff by separately considering diatonic shifts (depending on the interval you're transposing) and chromatic alterations. It's pretty nifty and intuitive.
> Also it's plain to hear that all those scales have different notes given that they all start on different notes, so clearly they differ by more than just the seventh degree.
Nitpicking, the scales are different in how they assign scale degrees but the sets/collections of pitch classes that define the diatonic scale (hence the key signature) differ by one note as described.
Re: Interactive piano reference to major and minor scales
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course it's a thing. C major, C natural minor, C melodic minor, C harmonic minor, the whole shebang: all the scales are there for every note, A through G and the sharps/flats. Heck. You could start somewhere in between recognized notes and make a major/minor scale based off that, if you had the right instrument. It's a ratio of frequencies, that's all. That's what all Western music music is based on. Divide the fr…
I think GP was just making a Monk joke, which I appreciated a lot - it made me smile and made up in a moment for all these downvotes! My "shallow dismissal" made some interesting discussion appear, at least. ..But, it seems maybe you meant to reply to me, not the GP.
Re: Interactive piano reference to major and minor scales
#46The black keys are in the wrong place! The black keys within a group are supposed to be spaced farther apart, and there should be less space between groups. For example, C# and D#, in the diagram, are too close to each other. C# should be farther left, and D# should be farther right.
Re: Interactive piano reference to major and minor scales
#47The black keys are in the wrong place! The black keys within a group are supposed to be spaced farther apart, and there should be less space between groups. For example, C# and D#, in the diagram, are too close to each other. C# should be farther left, and D# should be farther right.
There is an interesting "fudging" that has to happen, though, because 5/12 is not exactly equal to 3/7 (each of which should be the width of CDE relative to CDEFGAB.... 5 keys out of 12, or 3 white keys out of 7 white keys)
I actually discuss it in detail here (and all the weird ways people mess this up): https://youtu.be/xwKlKcymfDs?t=33
Here is some JavaScript code for calculating where each key should go. You can paste in the final numbers at bottom if that's easier. They start at the left of C (zero) and assume each white key is width of 1:
var firstFiveWidth = 3/7; // c-e, 3 white keys
var lastSevenWidth = 4/7; // f-b, 4 white keys
// assume each of the 5 is equal width at back
var cSharpMiddle = firstFiveWidth * (3/10);
var dSharpMiddle = firstFiveWidth * (7/10);
// assume each of the 7 is equal width at back
var fSharpMiddle = firstFiveWidth + lastSevenWidth * (3/14);
var gSharpMiddle = firstFiveWidth + lastSevenWidth * (7/14);
var aSharpMiddle = firstFiveWidth + lastSevenWidth * (11/14);
// average width of what a key in first five and a
// key in last seven should be (then halve it)
var halfBlackKeyWidth = (((firstFiveWidth/5) + (lastSevenWidth/7))/2)/2;
var keys = [
0,
cSharpMiddle - halfBlackKeyWidth,
1/7,
dSharpMiddle - halfBlackKeyWidth,
2/7,
3/7,
fSharpMiddle - halfBlackKeyWidth,
4/7,
gSharpMiddle - halfBlackKeyWidth,
5/7,
aSharpMiddle - halfBlackKeyWidth,
6/7
]
console.log("black key width: " + (halfBlackKeyWidth*2*7))
console.log(keys.map(function(item){ return item *7}))
And here are the numbers I got: ( C to B) black key width: 0.5857142857142857
[
0,
0.607142857142857,
1,
1.807142857142857,
2,
3,
3.564285714285714,
4,
4.707142857142857,
5,
5.85,
6
]Re: Interactive piano reference to major and minor scales
#48Re: Interactive piano reference to major and minor scales
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hmm I don't agree. That spacing looks right to me, but, now you mention it, the E,F,B and C notes look quite a bit too wide, I think that's the problem.
The spacing of the black keys is so far from the actual spacing on a real keyboard that I question how it could possibly look right to you. I would love to know if you actually have a real physical keyboard on hand, like I do, or if you are just going based on memory.
The width of all keys, white or black, should be equal to one another at the back of the keyboard.
The width of the white keys should be exactly equal to one another at the front of the keyboard.
Those can't both be true (since 5/12 isn't equal to 3/7), so the former has to be fudged a bit.
My formula is in a different comment. :)