I hope to outlive this age of spectacle.
The rise and fall of rationality in language
41–50 of 63 posts
Re: The rise and fall of rationality in language
#42Google Books is not a reliable sample of language over time due to shifts in genre representation that are correlated with all kinds of things like university library policies, interactions of OCR with typesetting practices, etc. Also note this is a “contributed by” paper which means it didn’t go through the usual PNAS review process. (Presumably the authors didn’t think it would make it through.)
After all, it’s the data that is widely available to people on the internet.
Re: The rise and fall of rationality in language
#43Re: The rise and fall of rationality in language
#44Re: The rise and fall of rationality in language
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a more basic problem which is victimization. And that sits on an even deeper layer of lack of competence broadly speaking on what to do about it. Maybe the issue is that our culture, economy, and technology has become so complex and exotic that very few people understand anything about how anything really works. We are surrounded by layers and layers of "magic." This might feel tremendously disempowering to people,…
I must note "things were more understandable" is an illusion. Ever since the iron age, very few people understood the art of ironmaking. People have been living in magic for a very long time.
Now you suffer from subprime mortgage based securities and cryptocurrency miners and microchip shortage you can't get a car or some shit. Same house increases in price 10x over lifetime because of - well, explanation takes a book. Go look at water bottle, it's made of materials average person can't even pronounce, popupropeline, polycarbonate. You put it in recycling but it killed a poor turtle in Indonesia because global supply chains and corruption.
Is this really comparable to, 'I need a new plought, and i dont know exactly all detail of how cousin jimmy does his hammering?'
Re: The rise and fall of rationality in language
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
> The grand old party will be 90-95% sycophants for a literal would be dictator. Where is the middle ground? The centrists are moderate Democrats. Can you tell me where to find these centrists? As far as I can tell, most online spaces not about the Right (well I don't go to Right spaces so I don't really know what they're like) are all about anti-capitalism or anarchism or socialism or communism or something, certain…
If capitalism of the day is literally destroying the planet and leading us to collective suicide, maybe being anti-capitalist is extremely moderate.
I feel nothing will be done about the issue until there is violence.
Re: The rise and fall of rationality in language
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
I must note "things were more understandable" is an illusion. Ever since the iron age, very few people understood the art of ironmaking. People have been living in magic for a very long time.
You are totally missing the point - A medieval peasant did well when they had good harvest, and did poorly when they had famine, this was pretty straight forward. Now you suffer from subprime mortgage based securities and cryptocurrency miners and microchip shortage you can't get a car or some shit. Same house increases in price 10x over lifetime because of - well, explanation takes a book. Go look at water bottle, i…
I think we feel like victims because modern life is basically walking along a tight thread of avoiding becoming a victim. The reality of that is if we live in a space surrounded on all sides by prisons heuristically it's not that much different than actually being in one.
Re: The rise and fall of rationality in language
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
In 2016 plenty of people were calling Trump an illegitimate President, and before that Republicans were questioning Obama's legitimacy due to his birth certificate, and before that Gore and Bush had the Supreme Court settle their contested election, and before that was Clinton's impeachment any less partisan? You act as if this is some new phenomenon, but it's just the latest data point in a dangerous game played by…
>You act as if this is some new phenomenon It's not new. What's new is having your tribe so convinced that an election was stolen and them so unquestioning that they storm and loot the capitol while being armed.
And in 2020 there isn't zero reason to think the election was stolen. There is overwhelming evidence that the amount of likely fraudulent ballots cast exceeds the margin of victory in several states.
Re: The rise and fall of rationality in language
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
>You act as if this is some new phenomenon It's not new. What's new is having your tribe so convinced that an election was stolen and them so unquestioning that they storm and loot the capitol while being armed.
Or you know having your tribe so convinced that they impeach the sitting president twice. People were calling for impeachment since day one. And in 2020 there isn't zero reason to think the election was stolen. There is overwhelming evidence that the amount of likely fraudulent ballots cast exceeds the margin of victory in several states.
Re: The rise and fall of rationality in language
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
>You act as if this is some new phenomenon It's not new. What's new is having your tribe so convinced that an election was stolen and them so unquestioning that they storm and loot the capitol while being armed.
Or you know having your tribe so convinced that they impeach the sitting president twice. People were calling for impeachment since day one. And in 2020 there isn't zero reason to think the election was stolen. There is overwhelming evidence that the amount of likely fraudulent ballots cast exceeds the margin of victory in several states.
"Far too little vote fraud to tip election to Trump, AP finds"
https://apnews.com/article/voter-fraud-election-2020-joe-bid...