Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is always posted like some 'gotcha', despite it being right there in the transparency report. In case you trust any company blindly: any company that wants to keep playing the money game will follow the laws forced upon them by the government they are beholden to.
Isn't this what seasteading, and other jurisdiction avoidance schemes attempt to address? I wonder if anything like that has ever worked out.
One is technical: e2ee, implementation transparency, and similar.
The other is social: have fewer institutions.
I have never understood people who think the latter is a good approach. Like, "I don't trust these people who use their real names and are registered in a jurisdiction that has strong privacy obligations, so I'm gonna trust some randos on an abandoned oil rig instead."