Live data from Hacker News

CT scans of AirPods evolution

scanofthemonth.com

41–50 of 343 posts

Re: CT scans of AirPods evolution

#41
post #24
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You need a seal to get significant bass from earbuds. the non pro airpods do not make a seal (by design).

If they experienced better bass on the G1/G2 Airbuds, it's not a seal issue.

The G1/G2 emphasize the high-bass to make up for the complete lack of sub-bass. Maybe that's the tuning they are looking for?

Re: CT scans of AirPods evolution

#42
post #36
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The reason is simpler than that. Battery will inevitably wear out, and it is a very deliberate planned obsolescence move.

I don't know about that. I still have my original AirPods, and they had no noticeable battery loss, and it's been over 3 years by now. They might have lost some battery if I tried to measure it empirically, but I have no way of knowing without measuring it explicitly, as I cannot really catch a battery loss of less than 5-10% with normal use over the course of 3+ years. But I use them all the time interchangeably wit…

I got the original Airpods and after less than two years the battery lasted like 15 minutes in one of the pods. They are a disposable product.

Re: CT scans of AirPods evolution

#45
post #41
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they experienced better bass on the G1/G2 Airbuds, it's not a seal issue.

The G1/G2 emphasize the high-bass to make up for the complete lack of sub-bass. Maybe that's the tuning they are looking for?

I primarily listen to rock. Airpods are great for that. I don't listen to much music that has significant sub bass.

Re: CT scans of AirPods evolution

#46
post #14
post #9

But somehow they cannot figure out how to make a replaceable battery. hmm

They can, it's just that the trade-off isn't worth appeasing a few HN readers. >The reason earbud companies use non-replaceable rechargeable batteries is simple: It makes the earbuds smaller. Earbud buyers generally prefer more compact devices, but that means the earbuds have less room inside for all the necessary components. Designers need to cram a Bluetooth chip and processor, an antenna, a battery, drivers, contr…

I think it is fairly impressive that Apple managed turn 200€ earbuds into disposable tech where users accept that they have to switch every two years or so. Before the arrival of the first generation AirPods, most people wearing AirPods today would probably have never even considered spending 200€ on a pair of earbuds/headphones, let alone do that regularly.

But I have to admit, my AirPods Pro are incredibly convenient

Re: CT scans of AirPods evolution

#47
post #27

My former coworker worked on airpods. Most of RnD for them was made in Apple's Shenzhen RnD centre which existence Apple for long time tried to hide.

the first airpods were released in Dec 2016, roughly the same time apple opened the Shenzhen r&d center, so I don't see how r&d for this product was done there.

Re: CT scans of AirPods evolution

#48

Wow, it’s the first time I’ve seen this site and format but what a great way to explain electronics and design.

I'm really surprised about the (thus-far) universal acclaim of the design. There's usually a lot of knee-jerk reaction against fancy browser effects like parallax and scroll-jacking in this crowd.

I think this implementation is mostly excellent, but as a web craftsmen, it would have been a fun/entertaining challenge to make a good non-javascript implementation underneath.

Re: CT scans of AirPods evolution

#49
Does anyone have a canonical URL to the previous month's scan of the LEGO mini-figure? I didn't see any navigation on the site unless there's a magic spot I missed or am inadvertently adblocking: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29253441

This month's entry comes off way too much like advertising for my taste, with the flowery language like "magic features" instead of just "features", or the seemingly-unnecessary sales statistics in lieu of a technical description of the Airpods Pro: "In 2020, Apple sold 110,000,000 AirPod products. Talk about mass manufacturing."

Maybe it's just an unconscious tic when talking about Apple products. Even I have a hard time not saying "Boom" when showing off something cool :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nx7v815bYUw

Re: CT scans of AirPods evolution

#50
post #46
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They can, it's just that the trade-off isn't worth appeasing a few HN readers. >The reason earbud companies use non-replaceable rechargeable batteries is simple: It makes the earbuds smaller. Earbud buyers generally prefer more compact devices, but that means the earbuds have less room inside for all the necessary components. Designers need to cram a Bluetooth chip and processor, an antenna, a battery, drivers, contr…

I think it is fairly impressive that Apple managed turn 200€ earbuds into disposable tech where users accept that they have to switch every two years or so. Before the arrival of the first generation AirPods, most people wearing AirPods today would probably have never even considered spending 200€ on a pair of earbuds/headphones, let alone do that regularly. But I have to admit, my AirPods Pro are incredibly convenie…

They're easily on the list of things I would replace immediately if I lost them, without even a second thought. The price is nothing for the amount of use I get out of them.
Post reply on HN